Re: Hamlib2 dependend packages for testing

2004-10-30 Thread Joop Stakenborg
Op za, 30-10-2004 te 15:47 +0200, schreef Andreas Barth: > So, xlog is neither build on all archs, nor ready to go in. > > > But, for both packages, there is no need that the release team takes > any action. Uploading and testing migration is still going normal, > please see Thanks Andreas. Act

Re: Hamlib2 dependend packages for testing

2004-10-30 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, * Joop Stakenborg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041030 12:25]: > I would recommend admitting xlog-0.9.10 and gpredict-0.4.0-5 into > testing. They have been build against the new hamlib-1.2.2, which > already made it into testing. > > Both packages already have been build on all architectures gpredic

Hamlib2 dependend packages for testing

2004-10-30 Thread Joop Stakenborg
I would recommend admitting xlog-0.9.10 and gpredict-0.4.0-5 into testing. They have been build against the new hamlib-1.2.2, which already made it into testing. Both packages already have been build on all architectures Thanks, -- Joop Stakenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: kernel and upgrades from woody to sarge

2004-10-30 Thread Andreas Barth
* Thibaut VARENE ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041030 01:45]: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:44:33 +0200 > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > + hppa: 64bit kernel with 32bit user land - details unknown. > If i remember correctly from the few attempts i made, the kernel has to be > upgraded (and the bo