clone 273958 -1
reassign -1 moobot
severity -1 serious
retitle -1 In process of being removed, should not be in Sarge.
thanks
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 02:50:41AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Brad Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | Please go ahead and orphan it, or straight out remove it from
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:00:11AM +0200, maks attems wrote:
> please remove kernel-patch-acl as it's completly useless,
> package includes patches against kernel 2.4.22/23.
> they are included in 2.6.8 so there is no point for that patch.
>
> maintainer indicated to have no time to maintain his p
please remove kernel-patch-acl as it's completly useless,
package includes patches against kernel 2.4.22/23.
they are included in 2.6.8 so there is no point for that patch.
maintainer indicated to have no time to maintain his package
see end of thread -> #250478
thanks
--
maks
kernel janitor
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 20:40]:
> On Tuesday, 28 Sep 2004, you wrote:
> > The only package in non-free left over is pgp5i; it is orphaned, but
> > somebody wants to adopt it and has already made packages (quite
> > recently). See http://bugs.debian.org/237370 for details.
>
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 Sep 2004, you wrote:
> > The only package in non-free left over is pgp5i; it is orphaned, but
> > somebody wants to adopt it and has already made packages (quite
> > recently). See http://bugs.debian.org/237370 for details.
>
> > non-free
> >
>
Hi Andreas,
On Tuesday, 28 Sep 2004, you wrote:
> The only package in non-free left over is pgp5i; it is orphaned, but
> somebody wants to adopt it and has already made packages (quite
> recently). See http://bugs.debian.org/237370 for details.
> non-free
>
> Package: pgp5i
> ITA, #2373
Hi,
I did some analysis of the packages in non-US. Short summary: Only two
are left over, but both have an interessted maintainer. One of them
could be moved to main, the other is in non-US/non-free, and needs to
stay there.
The only package in non-US/main left over is vtun. I spoke with the
main
>> > pavuk (unfixed; bug #264684) for DSA-527
>
>> pavuk 0.9pl28-3 fixed that. #264684 is left open only for the other
>> security hole mentioned there. We might need a DSA for that hole..
>> I'm not explicitly tracking it since it already has an RC bug.
>
> Package is in a weird state in the archi
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:00:54PM +0300, Niklas Vainio wrote:
> Please remove unrar from testing. It is not mature enough to enter sarge.
> See bug 265045.
RMs, please remove this package from testing. RC bug confirmed present.
Niklas, ftp.debian.org doesn't remove packages from testing, only fr
Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > ruby 1.8.1+1.8.2pre1-4 needed, have 1.8.1-8 for DSA-537
>
> This is fixed in ruby1.8 in testing; ruby itself is a dependency package.
> I don't know if ruby1.7 was/is vulnetable, do you?
I don't know.
> > CAN-2004-0818: star: local root exploit
>
> I
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:13:45AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:41:13 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Martin Schulze wrote:
> >> ruby 1.8.1+1.8.2pre1-4 needed, have 1.8.1-8 for DSA-537
> > This is fixed in ruby1.8 in testing; ruby itself is a dependency package.
> > I don't k
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:41:13 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
>> ruby 1.8.1+1.8.2pre1-4 needed, have 1.8.1-8 for DSA-537
>
> This is fixed in ruby1.8 in testing; ruby itself is a dependency package.
> I don't know if ruby1.7 was/is vulnetable, do you?
Ruby1.7 (ie, ruby-beta) is mo
12 matches
Mail list logo
