Re: ftp.debian.org: Please remove drgenius from sarge/sid

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 01:07:52AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:32:06PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer wrote: > > Please remove the drgenius source package from sarge and sid. This > > software has been superseded ages ago by drgeo, which is already > > packaged for D

Re: Please remove xpacman from unstable and testing

clone 263467 -1 retitle 263467 RM: xpacman -- ancient, non-free tags 263467 = sid confirmed reassign -1 xpacman severity -1 serious retitle -1 xpacman is in process of being removed, please don't include it in sarge thanks On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 05:38:09PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > I'm the

Re: ftp.debian.org: Please remove drgenius from sarge/sid

clone 262707 -1 retitle 262707 RM: drgenius -- Superseded by drgeo reassign -1 drgenius severity -1 serious retlte -1 drgenius is in process to be removed, keep out of Sarge for the time being thanks On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:32:06PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer wrote: > Please remove the drgenius so

Re: [l10n] Translation and the freeze of packages

Steve Langasek wrote: > I've reviewed the diff and it looks reasonable to me, but of course > we're still blocked by the absence of t-p-u autobuilders. At present, > it seems entirely possible that the proposed d-i test candidate will > become available before the exim4 t-p-u upload will be built

Re: [andreas.krueger@dv-ratio.com: Need "apt-get dist-downgrade" or similar when Sarge comes out.]

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:06:31PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Thursday 23 September 2004 06:11 pm, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > There is at least on possiblity to achieve this that I know of: > > aptitude lists all "obsolete" packages in an extra category. > > So one can just start aptitude

Re: remove lirc-svga from !i386 sarge

> We can address the former issue for you, but the latter has to be > handled by an ftpmaster following up on the already-filed #260565. Ok, I was just confused. It's the latter I wanted. I assumed that you have remove source packages from testing, not binaries. > Removing the current package fro

Re: devfsd: please push through

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:36:51PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote: > devfsd was essentially unmaintained until I adopted it. It was > already frozen at that point. My upload fixed lots of bugs and > the package has stabilized in unstable now (apart from > localisations which keep dripping in). > I uploa