Hi Bastian,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I've done a test build of sarge. About 250 arch any packages failes to build.
> I attached the lists of packages which failes because of
> - generic errors,
> - non-resolvable Build-Depends.
> The lists are not complet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's certainly ok to upload it, but from what I see this library isn't
> actually used by any packages in Debian. Are there other reasons why
> this library would be important to include in a stable releas
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I attached the lists of packages which failes because of
> - generic errors,
> - non-resolvable Build-Depends.
Please, could you group this by maintainer?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 12:39:25AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> I've done a test build of sarge. About 250 arch any packages failes to build.
The same test for arch all packages would be nice too. We've
come across several of those when building the amd64 archive and
most should have bugs filed
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:15:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I've packaged the newest stable release of libpqxx, 2.3.0. It's
> available here:
> http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/libpqxx-2.3.0/
> Currently this does not have any other packages depending upon it in
> the archive. This is a C+
I've done a test build of sarge. About 250 arch any packages failes to build.
I attached the lists of packages which failes because of
- generic errors,
- non-resolvable Build-Depends.
The lists are not completely accurate as one buildd built against sid by
accident. Also a lot of builds fails b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've packaged the newest stable release of libpqxx, 2.3.0. It's
available here:
http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/libpqxx-2.3.0/
Currently this does not have any other packages depending upon it in
the archive. This is a C++ PostgreSQL client libr
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:24:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:39:46AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
>
> > I am waiting fot hylafax to migrate into testing. The grep-excuses says
> > that it is not compiled in Alpha, while it has been compiled by buildd 4
> > days ago.
>
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For testing migration, it doesn't matter if a old version of it is in
> sarge or not. If it is not built on all archs in unstable, it does not
> go in[1]. So, to achive this goal, the outdated version in unstable
> needs to be removed. However, removing
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:52:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >Not any that are in non-US/main in any case, AIUI, which means they
> >probably wouldn't be released as part of a CD set.
> >
> >I believe getting non-US into working
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 10:52:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:20:56PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
>
>> Now that we have crypto in main, the only real use for non-US is for
>> packages that are encumbered by patents in the US which aren't encumbered by
>> patents
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:48:39PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I am the maintainer for GNU sed. As the Debian package maintainer Clint
> Adams may have already told this list, I have asked him to push sed
> 4.1.2 into Sarge. The reason for doing so is that 4.1.1 has a couple of
> particularl
Hi everybody,
I am the maintainer for GNU sed. As the Debian package maintainer Clint
Adams may have already told this list, I have asked him to push sed
4.1.2 into Sarge. The reason for doing so is that 4.1.1 has a couple of
particularly nasty bugs, and I would not be in favor of a Debian r
Am 2004-08-31 16:27:03, schrieb Michael Stone:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 12:35:58PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >No apology is necessary, because of (1).
>
> No apology is necessary because it's a ridiculous concept.
>
> I hesitate to tell people to use UTF-8 because full multibyte compli
On Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 11:33, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:52:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > It seems that our perl upgrade from woody to sarge is not robust if it
> > dies in the middle. The X problem below caused the first apt run to fail
> > with various parts o
> > Frankly, I am getting tired of discussing this issue. I can't
> > understand why you, gotom, are that stubborn and can't respect a
> > decision taken by the German translation team. You already stated
> > at the very beginning of this bug report, that you find it "not
> > well inspected" [6]..
Hi,
I want to raise some concern about the quality of the nagios-text
package in testing. There are a number of bug reports (at least
#239174, #257702, and #265467) that are fixed with the suggestion
mentioned in #239174. I also see that Madarasz Gergely has made
a suggestion about this bug in th
On 2004-08-29 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2004-08-09 Brendan O'Dea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:19:24PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~ametzler/debian/NMU/perl_5.8.4-2.1.NMU.diff
> All this has happened almost th
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:52:54PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> It seems that our perl upgrade from woody to sarge is not robust if it
> dies in the middle. The X problem below caused the first apt run to fail
> with various parts of perl unpacked and not configured. Then it looks
> like debconf (whic
Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 10:21 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:59:51AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 09:40 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > > Can you please temporary remove c
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:59:51AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 09:40 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > > Can you please temporary remove cyphesis-cpp package from
> > > sarge/testing to make a newer version
Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 09:40 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > Can you please temporary remove cyphesis-cpp package from
> > sarge/testing to make a newer version of it (not build on arm
> > yet), mercator and sear (also not build on
* Michael Koch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040901 09:40]:
> Can you please temporary remove cyphesis-cpp package from
> sarge/testing to make a newer version of it (not build on arm yet),
> mercator and sear (also not build on arm yet) migrate to it ?
For testing migration, it doesn't matter if a old v
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 09:20:47AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> Can you please temporary remove cyphesis-cpp package from
> sarge/testing to make a newer version of it (not build on arm yet),
> mercator and sear (also not build on arm yet) migrate to it ?
Removing the package from testing has no
Hi,
Can you please temporary remove cyphesis-cpp package from
sarge/testing to make a newer version of it (not build on arm yet),
mercator and sear (also not build on arm yet) migrate to it ?
Thanks for your time,
Michael
> At some point, gotom needs to either accept that the German team has
> *done* the deep thinking, or else do it himself. So far he declared
> it a wishlist item (AFAICT) and refused to either think about it *or*
> take the German team's word for it.
Well, maybebut being rude in words toward
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changing the behaviour of the german locale is certainly something
> that should not be done without deep thinking. The german team seems
> to have done this with the help of others like Denis. That's fine.
At some point, gotom needs to either accep
> Frankly, I am getting tired of discussing this issue. I can't understand
> why you, gotom, are that stubborn and can't respect a decision taken by
> the German translation team. You already stated at the very beginning
> of this bug report, that you find it "not well inspected" [6]... To me
>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:40:57AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> this hint from vorlon seems to not have worked (Bug#260508):
> # 20040826; done 20040828
> # RoM
> remove sympa/3.4.4.3-6
Re-queued.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
29 matches
Mail list logo
