For a while I've been tracking the sarge inclusion of QA-managed
packages. Here is a status report. Some of you are getting this
because you have done something relevant to one or more of these
packages and should stay on top of things. But I have set the
Reply-To to debian-release. If you rep
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:58:27PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi Release team,
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on debian-mentors:
> > On 2004-08-30 Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> * Updating tetex-bin makes 3 depending packages uninstallable on alpha:
> >> jbibtex-bin
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 12:57:17PM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:49:22PM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote:
> > hi :)
> >
> > What's the status of boost in sarge?
> > It seems that it is blocked by regina-normal's dependency on Qt.
> Yep, that's the status.
> > Could it be
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:39:46AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> I am waiting fot hylafax to migrate into testing. The grep-excuses says
> that it is not compiled in Alpha, while it has been compiled by buildd 4
> days ago.
It is also waiting for all other packages that depend on libcapi to be
i
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:20:56PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:22:41 +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> > Will there be non-US CDs for the sarge release? ISTR that some people
> > wanted to get rid of them, and I'm inclined to support that: These days,
> > the non-U
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:49:22PM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote:
> hi :)
>
> What's the status of boost in sarge?
> It seems that it is blocked by regina-normal's dependency on Qt.
Yep, that's the status.
> Could it be hinted into sarge by the release team or do we have to
> wait for Qt to be built
Hi Release team,
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on debian-mentors:
> On 2004-08-30 Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> * Updating tetex-bin makes 3 depending packages uninstallable on alpha:
>> jbibtex-bin, jmpost, ptex-bin
>
[...]
> We had already talked about this on IRC to
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:22:41 +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Will there be non-US CDs for the sarge release? ISTR that some people
> wanted to get rid of them, and I'm inclined to support that: These days,
> the non-US section isn't as useful as it used to be
Looking at non-US/main, most of i
Il lun, 2004-08-30 alle 12:24, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:39:46AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
[...]
> > May someone please check it? What's the problem?
>
> After packages have been built by the buildd there is an additional
> manual step where the package must be signed
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:39:46AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> I am waiting fot hylafax to migrate into testing. The grep-excuses says
> that it is not compiled in Alpha, while it has been compiled by buildd 4
> days ago.
> May someone please check it? What's the problem?
After packages have
Hi,
I am waiting fot hylafax to migrate into testing. The grep-excuses says
that it is not compiled in Alpha, while it has been compiled by buildd 4
days ago.
May someone please check it? What's the problem?
Thank you,
Giuseppe
Hi,
I'm currently going over the CD FAQ, updating it for sarge...
Will there be non-US CDs for the sarge release? ISTR that some people
wanted to get rid of them, and I'm inclined to support that: These days,
the non-US section isn't as useful as it used to be, and people who are
unfamiliar wit
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 05:10:40AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Package: plex86-internals-guide, plex86-users-guide
> Severity: serious
> These packages shouldn't be included in sarge. Please remember to remove
> them from testing and unstable (bug #266443).
Hinted for removal from testing.
Th
Whops!
I didn't think hinting might not be needed if I only update sablevm.
Thanks for explanation and sorry for the noise,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z nie, 29-08-2004, godz. 20:44, Steve Langasek pisze:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 02:42:31PM -0400, Grzegorz
14 matches
Mail list logo