On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 03:47:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:57:46PM +0900, Horms wrote:
>
> > There is a new kernel-source-2.4.26 package, 2.4.26-4
> > and a new kernel-image-2.4.26-i386 package, also 2.4.26-4.
> > There are no changes to the kernel-image package,
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> GnuTLS currently uses cdbs, which makes it difficult (or impossible?)
> to make use of Build-Depends-Indep.
I have decided to move the documentation to contrib.
The LaTeX code contains latex2html-specific macros which are nontrivial to
modify. The attempt at Hevea-izati
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:34:38PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I know, frozen for base packages, but fixing about 45 reports with
> this release. Packages at http://people.debian.org/~doko/bash/.
> The fixed bugs are marked in the BTS.
Do you believe the fixed bugs are important enough, and the
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 04:34:22PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:44:23PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > > The 1.1.6-1 packages of SableVM (sablevm and sablevm-classlib sources)
> > > didn't get into testing even
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:44:23PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > The 1.1.6-1 packages of SableVM (sablevm and sablevm-classlib sources)
> > didn't get into testing even though 5 days period is finished. Could
> > somebody please hint them again [
I know, frozen for base packages, but fixing about 45 reports with
this release. Packages at http://people.debian.org/~doko/bash/.
The fixed bugs are marked in the BTS.
Matthias
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 02:43:26PM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 04:08:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hello,
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:54:53AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > > I am the maintainer of murasaki. Current package is out of date and
> > > should no
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:38:37PM +, Thomas Skybakmoen wrote:
>Hi a question from a "normal" debian user:
>
>As sarge is comming to a server near me..
>I wounder why certian packages are so old when some are bleading new.
>bind (9.2.3) wich in debian is: 8.4.4
>bind9 | 1:9.2.3+9.2.4-
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:38:37PM +, Thomas Skybakmoen wrote:
> Hi a question from a "normal" debian user:
>
> As sarge is comming to a server near me..
>
> I wounder why certian packages are so old when some are bleading new.
>
> bind (9.2.3) wich in debian is: 8.4.4
bind9 | 1:9.2.3+
Hi a question from a "normal" debian user:
As sarge is comming to a server near me..
I wounder why certian packages are so old when some are bleading new.
bind (9.2.3) wich in debian is: 8.4.4
dhcp (3.0.1) wich in debian is: 2.0pl5
iptables (1.2.11) 1.2.9
modutils (2.4.27) 2.4.26 etc
I under
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 04:08:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:54:53AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> > I am the maintainer of murasaki. Current package is out of date and
> > should not be realesed with sarge. The main reason is that the current
> > packag
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:54:53AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> I am the maintainer of murasaki. Current package is out of date and
> should not be realesed with sarge. The main reason is that the current
> package does not work with 2.6 kernels.
> I filled an RFA, but nobody answer to i
Hi,
I am the maintainer of murasaki. Current package is out of date and
should not be realesed with sarge. The main reason is that the current
package does not work with 2.6 kernels.
I filled an RFA, but nobody answer to it. (#223819)
For more information on murasaki you can also read (#226518)
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Does this mean I should use urgency=high for a base-files upload
> > which says 3.1 in /etc/debian_version, or should I upload that
> > to testing-proposed-updates instead?
>
> I'm comfortable with either, as long as you use your best judgement when
>
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 01:07:09PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > There's a steadily increasing buzz about the status of the sarge
> > release, now that the new installer is on the home stretch. The release
> > team has been hard at work on finalizing
15 matches
Mail list logo
