Re: Gnome 2.6 in unstable should be ok now - Thx

2004-05-24 Thread Daniel Cardenas - AZ
Sebastien, Thanks for the hard work!!! From, Daniel and the 1000s of other Debian Gnome users. :-) Sebastien Bacher wrote: Hi, After a week of hard work we have made a lot of progress, so I hope this time it'll be ok for release time : * Architectures : We have full builds on these 10 arc

Re: gif-producing code and sarge?

2004-05-24 Thread Andreas Barth
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 11:10]: > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:26:26AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 00:40]: > > > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 08:57:39PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > So, I would like to move these packages / programs

Re: gif-producing code and sarge?

2004-05-24 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:26:26AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 00:40]: > > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 08:57:39PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > So, I would like to move these packages / programs into main (more > > > specifically, ppmtogif from netpbm-no

Re: gif-producing code and sarge?

2004-05-24 Thread Andreas Barth
* Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 00:55]: > Considering that it doesn't look like the freeze is really going to take > place any time soon, I'd hold off until at least the US expiry of the patent > before uploading. I doubt that there'll be any problems getting it in after > that. The

Re: gif-producing code and sarge?

2004-05-24 Thread Andreas Barth
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 00:40]: > On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 08:57:39PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > as far as I understood, we probably need for the release of sarge at > > least six more weeks, i.e. not before 4th July. Some packages are put > > into non-free/contrib because th

Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]

2004-05-24 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 10:29:58PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > > Seb: I realize you're anxious to get GNOME 2.6 into unstable, but Rhythmbox > > proved that you want to go too far too fast. Soon, but not now. > Sounds more like someone wants him to go too slow. Please note -release is not a discu

Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]

2004-05-24 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 03:10:18AM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote: > On Sun, 23 May 2004, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Le dim, 23/05/2004 ? 01:36 +0300, Martin-?ric Racine a ?crit : > > > Today, Rhythmbox 0.8.4 entered unstable, with rather unpleasant > > > consequences > > rhythmbox is not relate