RE: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

2004-04-20 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 15:14, Bradley Bell wrote: > > Also, glib is stalled because parts of it got in before a > > dropped connection, now I can't restart the upload because > > the files there prevent me from creating new files in a new > > upload. Any ideas, or should I just wait a day or two

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

2004-04-20 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Also, glib is stalled because parts of it got in before a dropped > connection, now I can't restart the upload because the files there > prevent me from creating new files in a new upload. Any ideas, or > should I just wait a day or two until the incomplete stuff vanishes

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

2004-04-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:16:51PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Also, glib is stalled because parts of it got in before a dropped > connection, now I can't restart the upload because the files there > prevent me from creating new files in a new upload. Any ideas, or > should I just wait a day

RE: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

2004-04-20 Thread Bradley Bell
> Also, glib is stalled because parts of it got in before a > dropped connection, now I can't restart the upload because > the files there prevent me from creating new files in a new > upload. Any ideas, or should I just wait a day or two until > the incomplete stuff vanishes? upload the .ch

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

2004-04-20 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 14:09, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 19:15, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:57:14AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:10:00AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > > > > As you know, the Debian GNOME team has been worki

Make the most of yor home

2004-04-20 Thread Chris Holcomb
Title: sunday Re-finance now, even with bad-credit! - Best Re-fi.nance Rate for cre.dit challenged. - Best Customer Service - Lo.west-int.erest-rates in years - Sa.ve $100-$400 per month Our easy application only takes 1 minutes.     -- To modify your future

Re: libpqxx: i386 binaries have gone missing

2004-04-20 Thread Per Olofsson
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 22:57 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > - - libpqxx-2.2.0 was obsoleted with the upload of libpqxx-2.2.1-1 which > replaced the binary package with a new libpqxx-2.2.1 package. Well, they have different names so libpqxx-2.2.1 didn't replace libpqxx-2.2.0. They're both in the ar

Re: Bug#225521: Bug#244583: broke base dependency freeze; cannot enter testing

2004-04-20 Thread Remco van de Meent
Joey Hess wrote: Remco van de Meent wrote: I have implemented the changes as mentioned above, and put the resulting pciutils 1:2.1.11-10.999 package on http://people.debian.org/~remco/ This version removes (replaces, conflicts) libpci2, and does not mention libpci1. It also does not warn for

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable

2004-04-20 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 02:24:54PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > > At the moment, afaics, packages have only been uploaded to experimental > > for i386 and powerpc. Please make sure they're building on all > > architectures before even considering a major change like this. > Sorry, but