WinAntiSPAM Confirmation #XMgwFmdWemhRJUCJZksT

2004-04-16 Thread delivery
Здравствуйте! Информируем Вас, что вы не зарегистрированы в нашей почтовой базе Ваше письмо, отправленное адресату delivery задержано. Для того, чтобы мы все-таки получил Ваше письмо, необходимо: 1.Либо просто ОТВЕТИТЬ на это сообщение. Выберите "Ответить" в Вашей почтовой программе. 2.

remove gtk-sources (at least from testing)

2004-04-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Hi. I suggest to remove gtk-source from testing because it is utterly broken: - it compiles files in /usr/share during runtime - it needs to be updated to gtk-2 - last upload was in 2001, debian maintainer == upstream CCing maintainer for comment. Should this package be removed from Debian unstab

Re: Bug#242666: libgcrypt7 is not supported

2004-04-16 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Joey Hess wrote: > Another fine waste of electrons: >> It's using libgnutls10? (Or is it using libgcrypt7 directly?) Hmmm. >> OK, I >> guess that's a good enough reason to put off the change. :-P > > Take a look at debootstrap's changelog sometime. Oh, debootstrap is still being used by defa

Re: libpqxx: i386 binaries have gone missing

2004-04-16 Thread Per Olofsson
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 15:00 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpqxx.html>, > version 2.2.1-2 is out of date on i386. Not when I look. I see: out of date on i386: libpqxx-2.2.0 (from 2.2.0-1) -- Pelle

libpqxx: i386 binaries have gone missing

2004-04-16 Thread Roger Leigh
According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpqxx.html>, version 2.2.1-2 is out of date on i386. However, I uploaded i386 packages with the source. When I looked in the archive, it exists as /debian/pool/main/libp/libpqxx/libpqxx-2.2.1_2.2.1-2_i386.deb Is this a bug in the testing migratio