Hi,
The excuses for Nice currently read:
# nice (0.9.5-1 to 0.9.6-1)
* Maintainer: Daniel Bonniot
* Too young, only 4 of 10 days old
* Not considered
* Depends: nice orp-classpath (not considered)
The strange part is nice depending on orp-classpath. Getting the
information from:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 11:04:39PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 227464 important
> reassign 232664 uucp
> I'm reassigning this bug back to uucp. The fact that
> mail-transport-agent did correlate with the rmail command in the past
> does not seem to impose an obligation on MTA maintain
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 16:54, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > => remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-3
> > > #225048 (data loss). I know this has been argued, but I still think it's
> > > not right to ship a package with a dataloss bug like this; your mileage
> >
On Thursday 25 March 2004 06.04, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > => remove sendmail/8.13.11.Beta0-1
> > #227464. Also #232664
>
> #232664 -- wow, sendmail and uucp, two of my favorite technologies, let
> me think about this one. ;p While I see in policy that it states rmail
> should be /usr/sbin/rmail
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 12:54:08AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > => remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-3
> > > #225048 (data loss). I know this has been argued, but I still think it's
> > > not right to ship a package with a dataloss bug like this; your mi
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > => remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-3
> > #225048 (data loss). I know this has been argued, but I still think it's
> > not right to ship a package with a dataloss bug like this; your mileage may
> > vary.
>
> My mileage doesn't vary. Package also was not sh
6 matches
Mail list logo
