Re: Suggest removal of icecast2 from testing

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:55:52AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > remove icecast2/1.9+2.0alphasnap2+20030802-1.2 > Bug #229720; the 'license-clean' version still hasn't been uploaded, and the > 'license-dirty' version shouldn't be released. Removal hint added. If I'm reading the bug log correct

Re: Cycle preventing removal

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 06:16:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:42:10AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Hmm, I think joint removal hints work. We'll see tomorrow. > ] remove cl-uncommonsql/1.1.8.5-1 cl-local-time/1.1.9-1 > That'll tell it to try removing the packages

Re: More removal suggestions

Le Saturday 13 March 2004 03:37, Nathanael Nerode a écrit : > I don't think it's reasonable to release the current version, and the bug > has sat at 'grave' since February 11 (a full month) with no visible > progress. Yes, I agree. I have seen that no cvs commit was done by the upstream since ja

Re: d-i second stage packages not in testing

On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 04:40:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > - pcmcia-cs 3.2.5-2.3 > sarge version is ancient and broken Forced. + out of date on i386: pcmcia-modules-2.4.22-386, pcmcia-modules-2.4.22-586tsc, pcmcia-modules-2.4.22-686, pcmcia-modules-2.4

Re: Cycle preventing removal

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:42:10AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hmm, I think joint removal hints work. We'll see tomorrow. ] remove cl-uncommonsql/1.1.8.5-1 cl-local-time/1.1.9-1 That'll tell it to try removing the packages, but it won't try them together. For that you need: ] remove cl-uncom

Re: Cycle preventing removal

On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:51:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * cl-uncommonsql can't be removed because it breaks cl-local-time-db > * cl-local-time-db is from the cl-local-time source package (only in testing) > * cl-local-time can't be removed because it breaks cl-metadata > * cl-metadata i