* cl-uncommonsql can't be removed because it breaks cl-local-time-db
* cl-local-time-db is from the cl-local-time source package (only in testing)
* cl-local-time can't be removed because it breaks cl-metadata
* cl-metadata is from the cl-uncommonsql source package in testing
We appear to have dea
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:01PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:10:33AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>> > Package: ncurses
>> > Version: 5.3.20030719-5
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> >
>> > Hi maintainer,
>> >
>> > In ftp://
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:01PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:10:33AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Package: ncurses
> > Version: 5.3.20030719-5
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Hi maintainer,
> >
> > In ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ncurses/ you can find
> > 5.4 versio
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:10:33AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Package: ncurses
> Version: 5.3.20030719-5
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi maintainer,
>
> In ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ncurses/ you can find
> 5.4 version.
>
> Please package the latest one as possible as you can.
> We need especially li
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 10:21:56PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Richard, do you read debian-release? If not, it would be helpful if you
> > had a Mail-Followup-To: header or similar saying so.
>
> In other free software ecosystems it is customary t
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
> Richard, do you read debian-release? If not, it would be helpful if you
> had a Mail-Followup-To: header or similar saying so.
In other free software ecosystems it is customary to CC the poster when
replying. Even if he/she is known to be the list a
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:58:07PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
> In order to cure this, we need to change the woody package, either to
> force it to do a dump in the prerm or to save all the shared libraries
> it needs to go with its binaries for use by the new package's postinst.
Afaik, It's
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> In order to cure this, we need to change the woody package, either to
> force it to do a dump in the prerm or to save all the shared libraries
> it needs to go with its binaries for use by the new package's postinst.
>
> Even then, there will be problems for those who don't
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 10:15, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Re new upstream package, it would be *very* nice if you would be able
> to test and smoothen the upgrade path from woody-pg to sarge-pg (sid-pg)
> as well. I've done a release upgrade before which resulted in a complete
> desaster with the daemo
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:15:39PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yep. Every day update_out.py calculates new Packages files for
> > non-US/testing, but they never actually get applied to the testing suite
> > in the non-US database.
>
> Right, but how come that is affectin
Colin Watson wrote:
> Yep. Every day update_out.py calculates new Packages files for
> non-US/testing, but they never actually get applied to the testing suite
> in the non-US database.
Right, but how come that is affecting packages which have already moved out of
non-US, such as gutenbook? I can
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:56:37PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > In other words, they're in both main and non-US. non-US isn't running at
> > the moment; please ignore weirdnesses related to it.
>
> Ok. So basically all packages that are still listed in the (outdate)
> non
Colin Watson wrote:
> In other words, they're in both main and non-US. non-US isn't running at
> the moment; please ignore weirdnesses related to it.
Ok. So basically all packages that are still listed in the (outdate) non-US
archive are held back because of it?
I just want to be able to print s
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:38:09PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:16:15AM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > > I saved update_output.txt from yesterday and compared it to todays'
> > > file. It turns out several packages are in the final: line for bo
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:16:15AM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> > I saved update_output.txt from yesterday and compared it to todays'
> > file. It turns out several packages are in the final: line for both
> > days. gutenbook and pgpgpg are two examples.
>
> They're in non-
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-07 at 00:19, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > According to Oliver (the primary maintainer) there will be a new
> > > bugfix upstream release soon, which would be a good opportunity to
> > > upload an updated package.
> >
> > It would be very nice to have this upda
16 matches
Mail list logo
