Re: GNAT 3.15p in Debian is a valid candidate for testing, but...

2004-01-09 Thread Matthias Klose
Miah Gregory writes: > Vn message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Miah, you said you wanted to evaluate options (orphan and remove the > > packages, adopt libgtkada, or build gvd against libgtkada2). Have you made > > any progress on this? > > U

Re: accepted: $package/$arch

2004-01-09 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:47:20PM +0100, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote: > > > What exactly does the /$arch suffix mean in update_output.txt? > > That binaries on that specific arch have been updated. The suffix is al

Re: accepted: $package/$arch

2004-01-09 Thread Björn Stenberg
Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote: > > What exactly does the /$arch suffix mean in update_output.txt? > > That binaries on that specific arch have been updated. The suffix is also > used in update_excuses. Were those packages already in testing,

accepted: $package/$arch

2004-01-09 Thread Björn Stenberg
Hi. What exactly does the /$arch suffix mean in update_output.txt? -- Björn

Re: accepted: $package/$arch

2004-01-09 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:54:42AM +0100, Bj?rn Stenberg wrote: > What exactly does the /$arch suffix mean in update_output.txt? That binaries on that specific arch have been updated. The suffix is also used in update_excuses. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>