Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

2003-11-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:53:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >... > > > I haven't found it explicitely mentioned, but the logial version number > > > for a binary NMU of version 1.0 would be 1.0-0.0.1

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

2003-11-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 07:53:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >... > > I haven't found it explicitely mentioned, but the logial version number > > for a binary NMU of version 1.0 would be 1.0-0.0.1 . > > A binary NMU implies you haven't changed th

Re: Status of mozilla packages for debian 3.1 release

2003-11-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:44:54AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote: > Eric Valette wrote: > > >This shows that very basic feature are not working with debian provided > >mozilla packages whereas they *do work* with the official mozilla binary > >and are therefore either due to maintainer changes (the