Attempted "testing propagation status" report

2003-11-17 Thread Nathanael Nerode
So, things look pretty good actually. KDE 3: Frustratingly slow. * Still waiting for kdebase 3.1.4 upload which is fully installable (including kdebase-dev, and therefore ksysguard). This is probably keeping other kde packages out indirectly; when their -dev Build-Dependencies are uninstallable,

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

2003-11-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:53:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Today, it's only 17 days until the officially announced "aggressive goal" > > for the release of Debian 3.1 [1]. That's a date many users know about, > > but I don't

Re: Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

2003-11-17 Thread Martin Schulze
Margarita Manterola wrote: > Now, I suggest: allow a way to add bug-fixes directly into testing, > instead of having them go through unstable first. If there's a new (and > very buggy) version in unstable, but there's an easy-to-fix bug in > testing, why not allow developers to fix this bug withou

Re: jack 0.75 mini-freeze

2003-11-17 Thread Wookey
+++ Andreas Metzler [03-11-14 22:46 +0100]: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:51:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > [...] > > What criteria are you using to classify this as a grave bug, given > > that the vast majority of sarge users will be running 2.4 kernels? > [...] > > I doubt the "vast majority

Re: Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

2003-11-17 Thread Margarita Manterola
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:23:00 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > You need a freeze at one point (unstable or testing) to get a base > where you can start to fix the remaining problems without new bugs > from new upstream versions. > The choices are: > - freeze testing and start then to backport all the b