On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 09:04:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> 146103 followup: any progress on 186299? any progress re: workaround?
A workaround (in fact, a correction to buggy code which caused the
compiler error) was suggested by gcc upstream, and I forwarded it to
#146103. As soon as I
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Joey Hess
> 157913 [ ] FTBFS: conflicting declarations
This bug is not reproducible on unstable ia64. There are plenty more
though, that make it fail to build. Pavel Tcholakov is already being
tracked by MIA tracking. I have NMU'd hylafax (5-day delayed), fixing
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:32:01PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote:
>> > # ulog-acctd (0.3.2-1 to 0.3.3-2)
>> > * out of date on arm: ulog-acctd (from 0.3.2-1)
>> > * out of date on m68k: ulog-acctd (from 0.3.2-1)
>> > What should I do?
>
> Check with the arm and m68k peo
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:32:01PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > # ulog-acctd (0.3.2-1 to 0.3.3-2)
> > * out of date on arm: ulog-acctd (from 0.3.2-1)
> > * out of date on m68k: ulog-acctd (from 0.3.2-1)
> > What should I do?
Check with the arm and m68k people (debian-glibc@lists.debian.or
4 matches
Mail list logo
