Previously Adrian Bunk wrote:
> To support Kernel 2.4 you we need to upgrade at least:
> - modutils
Won't happen for potato: it's either 2.0+2.2 kernel support or 2.2+2.4,
and I refuse to drop 2.0 kernel support from potato for modutils (there
are stil lots of people relying on that).
Wichert.
-
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:16:18PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > IIRC realplayer is orphaned.
>
> I don't this so:
>
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin10924 Dec 31 17:49
> /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/contrib/r/realplayer/realplayer_8.0.tar.gz
Eh?
% ssh auric dpkg -I
/org/ftp.debian.o
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IIRC realplayer is orphaned.
I don't this so:
-rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin10924 Dec 31 17:49
/org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/contrib/r/realplayer/realplayer_8.0.tar.gz
> > How's the way we cope with this kinda issue in the BTS -- "stuff fixed
>
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:55:03AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > > I suspect we won't make the end of Jan, but we may as well try for it.
> >
> > You may want to include realplayer from unstable; the one in stable is
> > no longer usable.
>
> If this is so, shouldn't someone file a bug and have
Brian Frederick Kimball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> > I suspect we won't make the end of Jan, but we may as well try for it.
>
> You may want to include realplayer from unstable; the one in stable is
> no longer usable.
If this is so, shouldn't someone file a bug and
Anthony Towns writes:
> I suspect we won't make the end of Jan, but we may as well try for it.
Yeah, my point. I need to move on really soon to woody, personally.
> Anyone have any worthwhile opinions on how 2.2r3 and 2.4.0 should get
> along? There already seems to be an iptables package and
6 matches
Mail list logo
