Re: 2.2r2 changes

Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there is a bug on mount right now because users get a "kernel version newer > than nfs" message with the new kernel in r2. If this is the case, a backport > of mount 2.10p can be easily made which will fix this. The warning is harmless. -- Debian

Re: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r2 Released

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 02:45:37PM +0100, Nils Lohner wrote: > Arse. I should have picked up on this earlier - the non-US Changelog is inconsistent. The r2 Changelog file names are relative to the dists/ directory, while

Re: [comments v2] Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r2 Released

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:34:05AM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Anthony Towns wrote: > pool/non-US/main/f/fsh/ is drw-rw-r--. Checked on two separate rsync-mirroring > mirrors. Interestingly, > http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/pool/non-US/main/f/fsh/ > works just fine. On

Re: [comments v2] Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r2 Released

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:34:05AM +0100, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 09:14:11PM +0100, Nils Lohner wrote: > > > [ any more comments? IMO its ready to go out when the release is made. > > > --nils ] > > Which should be finished now. I

Re: [comments v2] Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r2 Released

On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 09:14:11PM +0100, Nils Lohner wrote: > > [ any more comments? IMO its ready to go out when the release is made. > > --nils ] > > Which should be finished now. If the CD people want to start seeing if > anything's broken, or if