Uploads to proposed-updates (updated)

2000-11-29 Thread Anthony Towns
--- ed_0.2-18.1_m68k.changes --- ed_0.2-18.1_security.changes --- ed_0.2-18.1_sparc.changes --- kernel-patch-2.2.10-m68k_2.2.10-12_m68k.changes --- mc_4.5.42-11.potato.5_alpha.changes --- mc_4.5.42-11.potato.5_arm.changes --- mc_4.5.42-11.potato.5_i386.changes --- mc_4.5.42-11.potato.5_m68k.changes

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:42:28PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I have problems with those: > > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18pre21/pcmcia/memory_cs.o > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18pre21/pcmcia/ftl_cs.o > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/mo

boot-floppies 2.2.20 i386 uploaded

2000-11-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ok, despite the problems in building fixed after 2.2.20, and despite some persistent pcmcia modules problems, I'm uploading 2.2.20 i386. I can do another binary upload with a new pcmcia-modules set if it's supplied. My guess is that the following PCMCIA cards will be broken on the vanilla set of

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > pcmcia-cs > > OK, they're being uploaded right now. I have problems with those: depmod: *** Unresolved sym

Re: 2.2.20-2000-11-27 boot-floppies to test for upcoming 2.2r2 release

2000-11-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please test these new boot-floppies for the next revision of potato > release. They are based on 2.2.18pre21 kernels. Barring any problems, they > will go into incoming tonight or tomorrow. > > http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/disks-sparc/current/ Like

Re: modutils 2.3.11-13

2000-11-29 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > > I'm very curious to know what's going on here. Care to tell the story, > > I'm actually surprised modutils 2.3.11-12 did accept that line. What > happened is that years ago the syntax for conf.modules ch

Re: modutils 2.3.11-13

2000-11-29 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > I'm very curious to know what's going on here. Care to tell the story, I'm actually surprised modutils 2.3.11-12 did accept that line. What happened is that years ago the syntax for conf.modules changes, and a couple of months ago that file was renamed

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > pcmcia-cs > > OK, they're being uploaded right now. Ok, I'm building 2.2.20 i386 (binary only) with this ri

Re: Things should be ready for 2.2r2 soon

2000-11-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:20:57PM -0500, Ben Collins écrivait: > IIRC, debian-cd retains symlinks (so things like symlinks from > binary- -> binary-all will remain). Maybe this is a little > different, but I don't think debian-cd knows the difference (or does it > now?). It should manage symlinks

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > pcmcia-cs OK, they're being uploaded right now. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

2000-11-29 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:14:08PM +1100, herbert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > pcmcia-cs > > OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then. >