Re: Things should be ready for 2.2r2 soon

On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 01:03:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:15:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > I thought those were uploaded. If they are, then they need to be. I was > > told to expect pcmcia debs

Re: Things should be ready for 2.2r2 soon

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:15:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > I thought those were uploaded. If they are, then they need to be. I was > told to expect pcmcia debs by tomorrow night. The list would be much more useful if it contained

Re: modutils 2.3.11-13

And so it was. So that thing lived in there all this time, ever since I installed potato. Obviously, I did remove pcmcia right afte the installation (a long time ago). And that devil came back to life just between modutils 2.3.11-12 and 2.3.11-13.1 and tried to ruin my life :) Just like that. I

Re: sgml-tools for alpha/potato miscompiled?

On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > I just got this while upgrading an alpha: > > sgml-tools: Depends: libc6.1 (>= 2.1.94) but 2.1.3-13 is to be installed > > Oops? Fixed...new one is in incoming now... C

Re: modutils 2.3.11-13

Previously Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > ### update-modules: start processing /etc/modutils/pcmcia > path[pcmcia]=/lib/modules/`uname -r` > > ### update-modules: end processing /etc/modutils/pcmcia There you go, that line is broken. File a bugreport for pcmcia and remove /etc/modutils/pcmcia

Re: modutils 2.3.11-13

Here you are: ### This file is automatically generated by update-modules # # Please do not edit this file directly. If you want to change or add # anything please take a look at the files in /etc/modutils and read # the manpage for update-modules. # ### update-modules: start processing /etc/modut

Re: modutils 2.3.11-13

Previously Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > from 2.3.11-13.1 in proposed-updates vomits tons of bogous errors like > "... header not ELF format ..." or similar. Show me your /etc/modules.conf file. Wichert. -- / Generally uni

Re: modutils 2.3.11-13

# depmod -a from 2.3.11-13.1 in proposed-updates vomits tons of bogous errors like "... header not ELF format ..." or similar. downgrade to 2.3.11-12 makes it behave. cheers, Cristian On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > I just uploaded modutils 2.3.11-13 which is the bug and sec

sgml-tools for alpha/potato miscompiled?

I just got this while upgrading an alpha: sgml-tools: Depends: libc6.1 (>= 2.1.94) but 2.1.3-13 is to be installed Oops? Wichert. -- / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:14:24PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Yesterday evening (US MST) I tried building the modules a few more times > and had joeyh test them, but they always had symbol issues I don't > have gcc272 installed on my boxes, so I don't understand why the symbols > don't m

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In reference to a message from Herbert Xu, dated Nov 28: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > > pcmcia-cs > > > > OK, I'll do that on

Re: Things should be ready for 2.2r2 soon

On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 02:15:32AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:15:07AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > Things should be ready for the 2.2r2 release soon. The only outstanding > > issue I have is sparc boot-floppies, which should be done today. > > At least at the time yo

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

In reference to a message from Herbert Xu, dated Nov 28: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > > pcmcia-cs > > OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then. >

Re: Things should be ready for 2.2r2 soon

On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:15:07AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > Things should be ready for the 2.2r2 release soon. The only outstanding > issue I have is sparc boot-floppies, which should be done today. At least at the time you posted this, there don't seem to have been gnome-core .debs for sparc u

Re: Current 2.2r2 status

Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a special mantra I must chant to get one of them to produce these > coveted packages? :) We will have this done by end of day (midnight eastern) tomorrow come hook or crook. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Re: Current 2.2r2 status

"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Then it failed with a compilation error and Marcin Owsiany said: > Again this is my fault :-( > This is something I forgot about during integration of > LANGUAGE_CHOOSER - the Makefile tries to build dbootstrap-lc > even if USE_LANGUAGE_CHOOSER

Re: Current 2.2r2 status

Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ive see 2.2.20 appear now, shall I use that one? Last night I tried with a > CVS checkout, might have worked, if my ftp sever hadn't gone away... Wouldn't make a single bit of difference since the only change is the Alpha kernel version. -- Deb

Re: Current 2.2r2 status

On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 03:49:15PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 03:13:56PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > Did you do 'make check' ? Are you building with the language chooser > > per chance? Odd. It shouldn't be running this stuff unless you're > > building with the

Re: yet another snag (was Re: Current 2.2r2 status)

On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:30:22PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Herbert, can you please rebuild pcmcia stuff on your machine? Get the > pcmcia-cs OK, I'll do that on Wednesday night (+1100) if nobody does it before then. The compiler change is due to the kgcc/gcc272 detection in 2.2.18pre.