Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled

2000-05-04 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 08:40:26AM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > considered RC. (i.e. we're not going to delay a release because of problems in > a package that isn't even going to be officially released.) No, we should just pull them. They can't be critical. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMA

Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled

2000-05-04 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Yust to remember there's bug #57301 that the quake2* packages have to be > removed from slink (in 2.1r6). This has been done already (maybe your mirror is out of sync?). Bug should be closed. As a side note, non-free is not officially a part of Debian, s

potato release status -- boot-floppies 2.2.13

2000-05-04 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Well, 2.2.12 have a *number* of release critical bugs for almost all arches. Critically, the i386 build had some just pure file corruption which was making things very hard. Anyhow, we are building 2.2.13 source upload and powerpc right now. Hopefully the boot-floppies porters should have the ot