Re: update on 2.1r5 status...

2000-02-09 Thread Vincent Renardias
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Roman Hodek wrote: > > > > > > Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis? > > > > Here the m68k answer: > > Just to be 100% sure: the m68k boot floppies are okay now? There are files in proposed-updates that in

Re: update on 2.1r5 status...

2000-02-09 Thread Roman Hodek
> > Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis? Correction: mutt_1.0.0-3.2 for m68k is in proposed-updates, but we need mutt_1.0.1.0-3.2 instead. Seems I couldn't distinguish those version numbers :-) The newer version is currently compiling. Roman

Re: update on 2.1r5 status...

2000-02-09 Thread Roman Hodek
> Just to be 100% sure: the m68k boot floppies are okay now? Don't know, I don't do them. Roman

Re: update on 2.1r5 status...

2000-02-09 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000, Roman Hodek wrote: > > > Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis? > > Here the m68k answer: Just to be 100% sure: the m68k boot floppies are okay now? Regards, Anne Bezemer

Re: update on 2.1r5 status...

2000-02-09 Thread Roman Hodek
> Are there still compiles pending, or can I release 2.1r5 asis? Here the m68k answer: The following packages (you marked as M68K missing) are already in proposed-updates: tetex-bin_0.9.981113-4 nethack_3.2.3-3 mutt_1.0.0-3.2 groff_1.15.1.11a.7.Y2K-1 mush_7.2.5unoff2-7.0.1 adjtimex_

Re: update on 2.1r5 status...

2000-02-09 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote: > Ok, we'll see tomorrow if it has been accepted. Why wait when you can easily check that yourself? ~maor/dinstall/dinstall -n xxx.changes will tell you what dinstall will do with your upload. Wichert. -- ___