On Jan 24, Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>the /usr/share/{doc,man} was already corrected in -3.1. I currently
>uploading a -3.2 with doc-base fixed.
>(I'd very much like mutt to be fixed in slink since many people complained
>on debian-devel about this bug earlier this month).
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 23, Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Huh? what in mutt-1.0.0 makes it improper for use in slink?
> If you compile it on slink it will install the documentation part in
> /usr/doc, part in /usr/share/doc. Man pages will go in /u
> will have a look at it.
Just a mkdir -p debian/y2k is needed in debian/rules (before the dir
is used).
> the only m68k version of mutt I see is 1.0.0-1.100. It's severely
> buggy and 1.0.0-3.1 must be used.
Hmm... wasn't there a mail from the maintainer that -3.1 shouldn't be
used??
> huh? i
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Roman Hodek wrote:
> > package : tetex-bin
> > version : 0.9.981113-4
>
> already uploaded (tetex-bin_0.9.981113-4_m68k.changes)
list updated.
> > package : emacs19
> > version : 19.34-21.1
> > architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC & M68
> which version of adjtimex are you talking about?
-2.1, same as you. debian/rules does the following:
debstd README debian/README.debian
mv debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/adjtimex/* debian/tmp/usr/doc/adjtimex/
rm -r debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/
mv debian/tmp/usr/share/ma
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Roman Hodek wrote:
> Update:
>
> > adjtimex: will do today
>
> This version of adjtimex has a bug, too. It was to do something with
> docs in /usr/share/doc, but the slink debstd install them to /usr/doc.
> The package needs to be fixed.
$ dpkg -c adjtimex_1.6-2.1*deb
Update:
> adjtimex: will do today
This version of adjtimex has a bug, too. It was to do something with
docs in /usr/share/doc, but the slink debstd install them to /usr/doc.
The package needs to be fixed.
Roman
Hi Vincent!
Here's the status for m68k:
> In Incoming:
> slrn
slrn_0.9.5.7-16.0.9.5.3.6 recompiled today (will be uploaded soon).
> package : tetex-bin
> version : 0.9.981113-4
> architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC & M68K MISSING)
> issue: y2
Since we have a new kernel, do you need a new 2.1r5 boot-floppies with
that kernel?
If so, what date do you need it by? I'm rather busy with the potato
boot-floppies
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
9 matches
Mail list logo
