Previously J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> IIRC, I did report this dependency problem to either you personally or
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which should have reached you too) only some hours
> after the security fix was released...
Hmm, yes, I remember now. I think I already fixed that on
security.debian.org ba
Hi folks,
I had to make a new release of the stable tetex-extra version, because
of a y2k problem in dinbrief.cls which was just discovered.
It would be nice, if this fixed version could make it into the next
slink release (if there is any) together with the recently uploaded
tetex-bin with its
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > Security updates:
>
> package : lpr
> version : 0.48-0.slink1
> architectures: alpha i386 m68k sparc
> issue: remote exploit
not yet in dists/proposed-updates (but added in my list anyway)
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> > Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > > [Vincent 1999/12/20]
> > > package : lprng
> > > version : 3.5.2-2.1
> > > architectures: sparc only
> > > issue: fix dependency pr
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > [Vincent 1999/12/20]
> > package : lprng
> > version : 3.5.2-2.1
> > architectures: sparc only
> > issue: fix dependency problem preventing the creation of sparc CDs
>
> Euh, what
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> [Vincent 1999/12/20]
> package : lprng
> version : 3.5.2-2.1
> architectures: sparc only
> issue: fix dependency problem preventing the creation of sparc CDs
Euh, what problem? This seems to be the same version that is also
on secu
Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> Security updates:
package : lpr
version : 0.48-0.slink1
architectures: alpha i386 m68k sparc
issue: remote exploit
> [Vincent 2000/01/07]
> package : nvi
> version : 1.79-9.1
> architectures: i386
Only i386? I uploaded bin
7 matches
Mail list logo
