Argh... I forgot to add an entry to the list:
package : elm-me+
version : 2.4pl25ME+65-0
architectures: alpha i386 (M68K & SPARC missing)
vulnerability: y2k problem (date sorting)
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Here's a new list (added htdig securityfix).
>
> Can someone please check the y2k fixes and be a bit more specific
> about the problem with each package? No long description needed,
> but something more then just `y2k fix' would be nice..
I tried wh
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> > Can someone please check the y2k fixes and be a bit more specific
> > about the problem with each package? No long description needed,
> > but something more then just `y2k fix' would be nice..
>
> I a
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Can someone please check the y2k fixes and be a bit more specific
> about the problem with each package? No long description needed,
> but something more then just `y2k fix' would be nice..
I agree...
> [...]
> package : smartlist
> version
Hi,
libdb1_1.85.4-4_alpha.deb in proposed updates depends upon libc6.1 (>= 2.1)
This is presumably the result of it being built on a build robot
machine that has potato installed on it. This is the problem which
meant that the alpha sparc and m68k CDs are still 2.1r2.
I've not done an exhaustive
I've uploaded my kernel-image NMU to Incoming for stable. 2.1.12
boot-floppies is coming momentarily.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
6 matches
Mail list logo
