Here's a new list (added htdig securityfix).
Can someone please check the y2k fixes and be a bit more specific
about the problem with each package? No long description needed,
but something more then just `y2k fix' would be nice..
Another one that is missing is a new samba-doc package to bring i
Can someone please check if we need this for the 2.1r4 as well?
Wichert.
- Forwarded message from Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 12:36:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Developer Changes
Subject: sharutils 4.2.1-1 (source all i
Pre-test boot-floppies version 2.1.12 for slink 2.1r4 are available
at:
<http://www.debian.org/~aph/boot-floppies/2.1.12-19991209>
Changelog is below.
I shall upload this evening.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
boot-floppies (2.1.12) stable; ur
I've built (but not yet uploaded) a new version of 2.0.38 which fits.
Here's what I changed:
* remove options to reduce kernel size:
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DAC960, CONFIG_FIREWALL, CONFIG_SYN_COOKIES,
CONFIG_IP_ACCT, CONFIG_SCSI_CONSTANTS, CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDETAPE,
CONFIG_NETLINK, CONFIG_
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > I've just uploaded sharutils_4.2.1-1 to stable (proposed-updates).
> >
> > This contains a Y2K fix which I think is much better than the one
> > in sharutils 4.2-6, because the created shar script tests
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:
> I've just uploaded sharutils_4.2.1-1 to stable (proposed-updates).
>
> This contains a Y2K fix which I think is much better than the one
> in sharutils 4.2-6, because the created shar script tests for the touch
> syntax on the system it is executed.
Is
Hello.
I've just uploaded sharutils_4.2.1-1 to stable (proposed-updates).
This contains a Y2K fix which I think is much better than the one
in sharutils 4.2-6, because the created shar script tests for the touch
syntax on the system it is executed.
Sorry for the inconvenience, but I did not real
>I can give you a bootdisk only kernel. That way I can get rid of all the
>firewalls/masquerading, etc. Is that OK with you?
Yup -- it'll have to be!
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:52:42PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> The 2.0.38 linux kernel image grew by 80k and so we can't fit it all
> on one floppy again.
>
> I could split root/boot as in potato but that's kinda a big PITA. Any
> chance we could have a 2.0.38 kernel which is not so much lar
The 2.0.38 linux kernel image grew by 80k and so we can't fit it all
on one floppy again.
I could split root/boot as in potato but that's kinda a big PITA. Any
chance we could have a 2.0.38 kernel which is not so much larger?
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
10 matches
Mail list logo
