Re: Unofficial Y2K update for slink.

1999-11-23 Thread Christian Surchi
On 23-Nov-99 Vincent Renardias wrote: > However, we may try to release a "slink-and-a-half" later featuring a more > extensive update (At least: 2.2 based, XFree 3.3.5, October GNOME) I thought we would have do it surely, after freeze's rescheduling. What about it? Problems? :l --- Christian

Re: Unofficial Y2K update for slink.

1999-11-23 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote: > > However, we may try to release a "slink-and-a-half" later featuring a more > extensive update (At least: 2.2 based, XFree 3.3.5, October GNOME) Ehh, could you specify "later" more precisely? Otherwise "later" = "potato"... > 2/ non-i386 people

Re: Unofficial Y2K update for slink.

1999-11-23 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Vincent, do you have a list of packages you want in 2.1r4 somewhere? Wichert. -- / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024

Re: Unofficial Y2K update for slink.

1999-11-23 Thread Vincent Renardias
On 21 Nov 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Vincent, you should kick over your 2.1r4 stuff to debian-testing and > debian-release. Many of us (such as myself) can't keep up on > debian-devel and get their work done. ok, sorry. > I'm confused -- does this solution obviate the "slink-and-a-half"? "s