Dear Maintainer,
as there is no longer an embedded version of libraw, you might also
remove the corresponding paragraphs from debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
Package: kdeartwork
Version: 4:4.12.3-1
Severity: serious
User: alteh...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
please add the missing licenses:
./desktopthemes/slim-glow/LICENSE ((CC-By 3.0)
./IconThemes/kdeclassic/LICENSE
to debian/coyp
Package: analitza
Version: 4:4.13.1-1
Severity: serious
User: alteh...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
please add the missing licenses of:
analitza-4.13.1\analitza\pushvalue.h
to debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUB
Package: kdepim
Version: 4:4.13.1-1
Severity: serious
User: alteh...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org
thanks
Dear Maintainer,
please add the missing licenses of to debian/copyright.
I found at least files under the Boost-, zlib-license and CC-BY.
Thanks!
Hi Maxy,
unfortunately some po-files are licensed under a version of LGPL and
thus must be mentioned in your debian/coypright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
con
Hi Maxy,
I am afraid you missed this one:
po/bg/kauth5_qt.po:# This file is licensed under the GPL.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi Maxy,
as Scott already wrote, the license of po/bg/kcompletion5_qt.po is not
mentioned in debian/copyright and such I have to reject this package again.
As other packages have a similar problem, I would like to make things easier
and just mention: bg-gpl-problem
Thorsten
===
Please feel
Hi Maxy,
this package depends on libkf5textwidgets-dev. Did I miss it or didn't
you upload it yet?
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi Maxy,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Some files refer to the LGPL license text in COPYING.LIB. Please let
upstream add this file to the source tarball.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if
Hi Maxy,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please revise your debian/copyright. I found files licensed under CC-BY-SA-3.0
or CC0 without an entry in debian/copyright. Please also mention public domain
files and remove all files under CC-BY-SA 2.0 which is not compatible with DFSG.
same reason as older version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi Maxy,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please revise your debian/copyright. I found files licensed under BSD,
GPL-3+, CC-BY-SA, LGPL and Expat. Please mention all of them in your
debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't un
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
same as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Hi Maxy,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
I found some files licensed under BSD or Intel License Agreement.
Please add them to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upl
Hi Maxy,
I makred your package for accept, but please take care of:
W: kate source: syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright line 379: Cannot parse line
"License GFDL-1.2"
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Hi Maxy,
I marked the package for accept, but please take care of:
W: konsole source: syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright line 189: Continuation line
outside a paragraph (maybe line 188 should be " .").
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi Maxy,
please mention the LGPL license for some *.po in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt
the user workstation.
+
+ -- Thorsten Alteholz Thu, 20 Sep 2018 21:03:02 +0200
+
okular (4:16.08.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Automatic packaging ]
diff -Nru okular-16.08.2/debian/patches/CVE-2018-1000801.patch
okular-16.08.2/debian/patches/CVE-2018-1000801.patch
--- okular-16.08.2
Hi Lisandro,
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
po/ca/* and others are LGPL 2.1 or 3, without generic or later clause,
so "LGPL-2.1+ or LGPL-3+" is incorrect.
Fair, but does it *really* deserves a reject? The license is still dfsg
compliant and there is only one tin
Hi everybody,
I marked the package for accept, but please take care of:
W: latte-dock source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright lgpl-2.1+
(paragraph at line 79)
Thanks!
Thorsten
... same reason as for kdialog ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Pino,
please mention the .po files that are under LGPL in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
please also mention the LGPL of some .po files in your debian/copyright.
COPYING.DOC mentions GFDL, so maybe that should also appear.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which ad
Hi Steve,
I marked your package for accept, but one of our trainees found:
* copyright file misses files (tests/CMakeLists.txt)
* copyright file lists others with not longer applicable license
(src/Messages.sh)
* copyright file does no aggregation whatsoever
Thanks!
Thorsten
... as requested on irc.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgpOwIAaq7t6r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Maxy,
please also mention the GPL-2+ files from the source package in your
debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Package: kf5-messagelib
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
the following vulnerabilities were published for kf5-messagelib.
CVE-2016-7967[0]:
| KMail since version 5.3.0 used a QWebEngine based viewer that had
| JavaScript enabled. Since the generated html is executed in the local
| file se
Version: 4:16.04.3-2
Hi everybody,
thanks a lot for all the information, which are on their way to the
security tracker now. So this bug can be closed again.
Thorstzen
Dear Maintainer,
your debian/copyright definitely needs some rework. I found files licensed
under the Apache licene:
e.g.
3rdparty/google-breakpad/src/third_party/protobuf/protobuf/gtest/scripts/upload.py
some are under CC-BY 3.0 (-> krita/data/README) or CC-BY 2.5:
e.g. kexi/webforms/webroot/
Dear Maintainer,
marked for accept but please take care of:
W: plasma-widget-kdeobservatory: syntax-error-in-debian-changelog line 733
"badly formatted heading line"
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
I've added some copyright-1.0 blocks to the copyright file, but I haven't found
any file under the zlib license but a reference in
./mobile/licenses/licenses.xml saying that libpng is under it.
Oh, ok, I guess I stumbled over this license collectio
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Pino Toscano wrote:
NO!
too late ...
Please don't reject just because of that, calligra can be perfectly
binNMUed on amd64 once it has been accepted. Reuploading means going
to the NEW queue _again_.
But it doesn't matter which version needs to go through NEW, does it?
as requested by Maxy
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
bad licenses
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Hi Pino,
I marked your package for accept, but:
cantor.appdata.xml: CC0-1.0
Please add this to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi Scarlett,
unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the LGPL
of some po-files in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
con
Hi,
this seems to be wrong:
E: kservice source: version-substvar-for-external-package libkf5service-dev ->
libkf5service5-doc
While you are at it, can you please take car of:
W: kservice source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3+
(paragraph at line 128)
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi,
please mention also at least
kmailtransport-17.08.0/kioslave/src/smtp/smtp.*
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
I marked the package for accept, but as the license of debian/* should
be GPL-3+, the license text should not only point to GPL-3.
Thorsten
Hi,
please also mention at least:
xdg-desktop-portal-kde-5.10.5/src/print.cpp
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Maxy,
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
El 2017-10-29 a las 16:29 +, Thorsten Alteholz escribió:
I marked the package for accept, but as the license of debian/* should be
GPL-3+, the license text should not only point to GPL-3.
I'm not completely sure what's
Hi Maxy,
please mention at least the SIL OPEN FONT LICENSE in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Scarlett,
our hardworking trainees attached a note to your package:
The new examples package should not be arch:any. Also, this new
binary package is very, very small. Surely the single .cpp file
could just go into the -dev packages.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to th
Hi Lisandro,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
qt3d-opensource-src-5.6.0/examples/qt3d/audio-visualizer-qml/music/tiltshifted_lost_neon_sun.mp3
seems to be licensed under CC-BY-ND, which is not DFSG compatible.
So please remove this file.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to
Hi Lisandro,
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
Hi! I am working with upstream to get this relicensed or changed. Would cc-by
3.0 or 4.0 be ok?
yes, bot are fine.
Thorsten
Hi Peter,
unfortunately I have to reject the package.
As
calligra-2.8.5+dfsg/kexi/webforms/webroot/default/media/javascripts/lightbox.js
is licensed under CC 2.5, please remove it from the source tarball.
As well, lintian complains about the lena picture, which is non-free.
While you are at
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi Maxy,
please add the LGPL 2.1 license of some po files to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hi Maxy,
according to README moo.ogg is under gfdl 1.2.
Please add this to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi,
your package Recommends: kde-style-qtcurve4 and orion-gtk-theme.
Can you please tell me where I can find this?
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https:
Hi Maxy,
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
Would an alternative be still conflicting with policy point 2.2.1?
as long as there is one alternative so that all Depends: and Recommends:
can be installed, everything is fine.
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ
Hi Maxy,
this is another case for po-lpgl-license missing.
Besides I couldn't find libqt5-dbg ...
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi Maxy,
sorry, but this is another missing-lgp-in-po-file problem.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.d
Hi Maxy,
I marked the package for accept now, but as you Recomends: sddm, please
upload sddm to unstable as well.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https:
Hi Maxy,
please reupload without the missing Recommends: kffmpegthumbnailer
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-
Hi Maxy,
I am afraid something bad happened. kwayland-data contains only 80 bytes of
data.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Patrick,
please also mention at least Christian Mollekopf and 2018 Rémi Nicol in your
debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
please also mention the licenses and copyright holder of the .po/.mo-files.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Scarlett,
please also mention the LGPL of some po files in your debian/coypright.
Besides there are several other files licensed under CC0.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files whic
... as requested on IRC.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgpkNYxklJyzN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
... as requested on IRC.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgpYJyQUr8M1G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
... as requested on IRC.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgppNLQvLH_P2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I marked the package for ACCEPT, but shouldn't you name the license block
"GPL-3+" as well?
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Pino,
please also mention the LGPL of some .po-files in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Pino,
in this package there are files under the GPL-2
(stellarsolver/astrometry/libkd/an-fls.h) mixed with files under GPL-3+.
According to [1] this is not allowed.
Thorsten
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#AllCompatibility
===
Please feel free to respond to this emai
... as requested on IRC.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgpGovLEU1kOq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
please also mention the translators in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgpE7JYfT032c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Matthias,
I marked the package for ACCEPT, but please change "version 3" of the GPL-2
license block to "version 2"
and "version 2.1" of the LGPL-3 license block to "version 3".
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Norbert,
please also mention the LGPL of some po-files in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
same reason as other version ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Norbert,
please mention all copyright holders in your debian/copyright.
Among others for example Marco Martin and Carl Schwan are missing.
While you are at it, please also mention that some files are also available
under other licenses, especially GPL.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel
as requested by uploader ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
you want to mix software licensed under GPL-2:
Files: src/3rdparty/assimp/src/contrib/zlib/contrib/ada/*
License: GPL-2
with software licensed under GPL-3+
Files: *
License: GPL-3+
According to [1] this is not allowed!
Thorsten
[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllC
Hi,
please also mention the LGPL of some po files in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Simon,
please also mention the translators from po/* in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgpMcTtgTDOWd.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi Aurelien,
On 23.01.25 17:48, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
I’ve removed the offending files, uploaded 6.1.0+dfsg-1 and raised a bug
upstream :
thanks for taking care of this.
Thorsten
Hi,
some png files contain a CC NC license in their metadata. Please remove those
files from the source tarball.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pg
87 matches
Mail list logo