Bug#456156: cannot mount usb device; incomprehensible error message

2007-12-13 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: konqueror Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6etch1 I inserted a USB stick. A window appeared with the following text: window title: KDE Daemon A new medium has been detected. What do you want to do? Medium type: Unmounted Removable Medium Open in New Window Do Nothing

Bug#456156: Anyone listening?

2008-03-12 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Am I to infer from the total silence in response to this report that this is the intended behaviour? ttfn/rjk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#456156: Anyone listening?

2008-03-20 Thread Richard Kettlewell
> > Hi, > > 2008 m. March 12 d., Wednesday, Richard Kettlewell ra=C5=A1=C4=97: > > Am I to infer from the total silence in response to this report that > > this is the intended behaviour? > No, it is not. Post output of `id` command run from your KDE session. >

Bug#456156: closed by Ana Guerrero (Re: Bug#456156: cannot mount usb device; incomprehensible error message)

2008-07-02 Thread Richard Kettlewell
reopen 456156 quit Closing since this problem should be fixed doing this: On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 03:51:36PM -0400, Matthew Rosewarne wrote: In order for a user to mount devices from Konqueror/Nautilus (using HAL), they must be in the "plugdev" group. To add a user to the plugdev group, eithe

Bug#456156: closed by Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#456156: cannot mount usb device; incomprehensible error message)

2008-07-02 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Ana Guerrero wrote: That the fix is not up to your satisfaction is not a reason to re-open the bug :) The original problem should be fixed, and what caused the problem was not created by kde, it is a problem with pmount, and its way to manage this, read the document README.Debian distributed in

Bug#456156: closed by Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#456156: cannot mount usb device; incomprehensible error message)

2008-07-02 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Ana Guerrero wrote: Hi Richard, On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:14:39PM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote: Ana Guerrero wrote: That the fix is not up to your satisfaction is not a reason to re-open the bug :) The original problem should be fixed, and what caused the problem was not created by kde

Bug#275098: Konqueror won't display JPEG thumbnails

2004-10-05 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: konqueror Version: 3.2.2-1 konqueror no longer displays thumbnails of JPEGs for me. Other file types, including PNG and MPEG, GIF still work. I've checked the following things so far: * I'm using 'icon view' * View->Previews->Show previews is on * View->Previews->Images is ticked *

Bug#249150: kdelibs-bin 3.2.2-2 deletes all desktop menus

2004-05-15 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Package: kdelibs-bin Version: 3.2.2-2 Severity: grave After upgrading to the latest KDE in testing, all my menus have disappeared. The suggestion I've seen in various places of installed menu-xdg doesn't make any difference. ttfn/rjk

Bug#249150: kdelibs-bin 3.2.2-2 deletes all desktop menus

2004-05-15 Thread Richard Kettlewell
severity 249150 normal quit Richard Kettlewell writes: > Package: kdelibs-bin > Version: 3.2.2-2 > Severity: grave > > After upgrading to the latest KDE in testing, all my menus have > disappeared. > > The suggestion I've seen in various places of installe

Bug#247407: kicker: No menu entries at all

2004-07-05 Thread Richard Kettlewell
I see the same behaviour. > I heard one other report of all menu entries going away during the 3.1.5 -> > 3.2 upgrade. After logging out and logging back in, they were back for > that user. Is that the case for you? I'm not the original submitter but I see the same bug. Logging out and back

Bug#247407: kicker: No menu entries at all

2004-07-05 Thread Richard Kettlewell
Richard Kettlewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I see the same behaviour. > >> I heard one other report of all menu entries going away during the >> 3.1.5 -> 3.2 upgrade. After logging out and logging back in, they >> were back for that user. Is that t