On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 05:03:45PM -0500, Christopher Martin wrote:
> To fix this, we'd need either to ship a kdmrc that conforms to the
> kcontrol configurator's basic pattern, and so wouldn't be modified by
> kcontrol more than is really necessary (could we make it keep the
> comments, at leas
Precisely due to the fact that Debian releases are so seldom do you
think Microsoft won't add IDN support to IE7 in Longhorn next year? If
they do Debian won't be able to access the many sites that will pop up
soon after IE adds official support. Perhaps the release team/stable
release manager need
I have subscribed to this list but I never got back the second email, so
I am sending a test email to see if it actually worked.
Chris Cheney
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:17:34PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Freitag, 29. August 2003 19:23, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > I have subscribed to this list but I never got back the second email, so
> > I am sending a test email to see if it actually
It appears Qt 3.2.1-1 has found more compile breakage in g++-3.3. I have
not filed an RC bug on g++-3.3 yet, I will let Martin do it since it is
his package suffering the breakage.
On the bright side the following archs have it compiled so far:
alpha
hppa
ia64
i386
powerpc
s390
- Chris Cheney
Ralf,
Do you know why STL is being disabled on Qt3 for Debian? Martin said
you said "it breaks lotsa stuff". However, the bug reporter mentions
that other dists use it...
Thanks,
Chris Cheney
pgp1M7bGMvoDL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
20030901. Right now it appears that the only real problem we will
face is with the mips buildd since it is not being maintained very well
(apparently).
Chris Cheney
pgp3tFQQ3S2k8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:21:55PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> Hi guys,
>
> I'd like to sum up some of my thoughts on how things will proceed with KDE
> into next year and how we can at least try to get things as easy as possible
> for the users.
>
> Library mes
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:09:55PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> Hi,
>
> FYI, while communicating with Matt Zimmerman a couple of weeks back on
> security issues for KDE (that the woody debs on kde.org have those fixed as
> well - Martin Schulze included that info
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:29:34PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Dienstag, 2. September 2003 19:27, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> > Once KDE 4 is being worked on upstream we will need to try to get all
> > the rest of the mess cleaned up. Hopefully
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:32:06PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> Hi Calc,
>
> anything about moving the kaddprinterwizard.so/.la and knotify.so/.la to
> kdelibs4 from kdelibs-bin ? We need to do that too to have a clean upgrade
> path; kaddprinterwizard.so/.la is a
I just noticed that Qt 3.2.1 shows fonts that fontconfig doesn't know
about, including CJK fonts. I thought this bug had been fixed already
before. If this is intended behaviour for some reason let me know why.
:)
Thanks,
Chris
Example:
# fc-list ':spacing=mono' | cut -f 1 -d ":" | sort -u
Bit
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:39:47AM +0200, Ricardo Galli wrote:
> > Let us know if there are any problems so far beyond the usual style/font
> > breakage :-)
>
> Hi.
>
> I've done exactly that, still can't compile kde. Same error as
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=208213
>
>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:49:44PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a pretty much functioning kdebindings 3.1.3 ready for
> sid upload, see the attached changelog for details.
Did you manage to get the java parts to compile using gcj?
Chris
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 04:23:34PM -0400, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On September 03, 2003 16:12, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know that only xfree 4.3 supports xrandr but however, kdebase ships
> > krandr in case you're compiling
KDE 3.1.4 will most likely be released to packagers within the next
week. I have decided to wait until it has been released to upload the
new KDE packages to Debian instead of just pulling current BRANCH. Also
are there any bugs that I should be aware of that must be fixed with the
next upload (bes
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:16:50PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> > KDE 3.1.4 will most likely be released to packagers within the next
> > week. I have decided to wait until it has been released to upload the
> > new KDE packages to Deb
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 08:24:17PM +0100, Paul Cupis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> As I'm sure some of you are aware, kdemultimedia in sid has not been
> installable for over a week. This appears to be due to an NMU from 27th
> August[1].
>
> The NMU
ROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:47:32 -0500
From: Allan Sandfeld Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Albertslund Ungdoms Boliger
To: Arnold Krille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Scott Wheeler &l
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:50:07PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> The GCC bug has been fixed in the latest upload, today.
>
> XFree86 4.2.1-11 seems to be new enough to handle everything.
>
> Bug 203303 is still out there. However, losing kdemultimedia for a
> while sounds acceptable to me
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:11:29PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Anyone have a clue what's going on there? It looks like a timeout, but I
> heard rumors it was a toolchain problem. How soon can this get fixed?
The mips buildd was not updated to g++ pre4 (pre3 had c++ miscompile RC
bug) when i
into
the source.
Thanks,
Chris Cheney
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for arts 1.1.4-2
The debian/patches dir is not included since it changes with each release.
M +14 -0 changelog 1.11.2.8
M +21 -8 control 1.20.2.4
M +57 -38rules 1.15.2.6
-if (execPrefix!="NONE")
- kdedirList.append(execPrefix);
-#endif
-
QString localKdeDir;
if (getuid())
{
@@ -1035,6 +1029,14 @@
addPrefix(dir);
}
+// UGLY HACK - MOVED THIS SO IT WOULD BE IN ORDER - Chris Cheney
+addPrefix("/usr/local"
I have found the proper way to set prefixes in kderc. However, it is
not really useful from what I can tell.
[Directories]
prefixes=/usr/local,/usr
The reason this is not useful is because of the ordering of the
prefixes.
$HOME/.kde:$KDEDIRS:$exec_prefix:prefixes
It should be:
$HOME/.kde:$KDED
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian specific patches are for now being maintained outside of cvs
Rkdelibs.dirs.diff 1.2.2.1
Rxlibs-pic.diff 1.1.2.1
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for kdelibs 3.1.4-2
M +16 -0 changelog 1.221.2.10
M +50 -10control 1.231.2.13
M +82 -43rules 1.221.2.8
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:40:27AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> On Monday 06 October 2003 03:42, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > CVS commit by ccheney:
> >
> > debian specific patches are for now being maintained outside of cvs
> >
> >
> > Rkdelibs.dirs.
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:34:52PM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> On Monday 06 October 2003 07:57, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:40:27AM +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> > > On Monday 06 October 2003 03:42, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > > CVS commit by c
sn't it?) [madkiss]
See above, yes qt-x11-free needs to be rebuilt, but probably after
the new libXft goes into sid.
> 2. kdelibs must be rebuilt because Xrender moved to /usr/lib,
>and kdelibs-data needs some sort of Conflicts or something for
>the k3b issue (bug 214534). [
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:50:26PM +0100, David Pashley wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2003 at 14:31, Nikita V. Youshchenko praised the llamas by saying:
> > Hello.
> >
> > What is the current policy about reporting bugs in KDE from sid (like
> > #216228)? Should Debian BTS or KDE BTS be used?
> >
> > It's
to
figure out what is causing the problem and perhaps be able to fix it?
Thanks,
Chris Cheney
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I wanted to let everyone know that #203303 still is causing
kdemultimedia to fail to build. Using -fpermissive doesn't seem to help,
at least not when patching it into the Makefile.am's.
Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
The current status of KDE in sid is below. I noticed some of the
packages are being SKIPPED on m68k, why is that? Hopefully the buildds
will retry the packages that failed due to libxft2-dev soon.
Also please read:
http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/debian-kde-policy.html
Chris Cheney
arts
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:39:48AM +1000, Ben Burton wrote:
> I think the biggest inconvenience I forsee is with the BTS - I'd have to
> start keeping track of multiple maintainer email addresses, and it will
> be more difficult to track the bugs in the packages that I'm looking
> after amongst the
The current[1] status of KDE in sid is below. I noticed some of the
packages are being SKIPPED on m68k, why is that? Hopefully the buildds
will retry the packages that failed due to libxft2-dev soon.
Chris Cheney
[1] - Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:49:42 -0500
arts
---
Done.
Needs reorganization of
ng by rmurray-resume [optional:out-of-date]
Previous state was Needs-Build until 2003 Oct 08 14:04:39
And no it has not been building for 12 days straight, it only takes mips
14hrs to build kdelibs. It failed due to a build depend and was not
reset as Dep-Wait.
Chris Cheney
[1] - Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:
The current[1] status of KDE in sid is below. Hopefully the buildds
will catch up soon then I can upload a new kdelibs.
Chris Cheney
[1] - Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:16:39 -0500
arts
---
Done.
Needs reorganization of libartsc0 so that apps won't pull in libarts1.
kdelibs
---
mips-
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:54:51AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >The current[1] status of KDE in sid is below. Hopefully the buildds
> >will catch up soon then I can upload a new kdelibs.
>
> Is there really any reason to wait for them to catch up?
Well until kdelibs is built on all archs oth
,
Chris Cheney
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 07:45:05AM +0100, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> I'm not a debian developer but I could do one or two of the higher-level kde
> things, such as kdenetwork or kdeadmin. I will do what I can before becoming
> a developer, reading thougfh the new mantainers stuff on www.debian.org in
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 04:10:11PM +0100, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> and #212933
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:10:58 +0100
> User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: Text/Plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Description: clearsigned data
causes kde packages to fail to build.[4]
Chris Cheney
[1] - Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:21:46 -0500
[2]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdeedu&ver=4%3A3.1.4-1&arch=m68k&stamp=1066835693&file=log&as=raw
[3]
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdegames&
I just noticed the real reason quanta failed to build on m68k was due to
crest getting SIGTERM. So it was shut down during the beginning of the
build.
Chris
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:58:34PM +0100, Peter Nuttall wrote:
> my point was questioning the value of a meta-package that would be the
> logical
> thing to install if you were wanting kde but that seemed to be both big and
> broken.
It will be primarily of use for stable Debian releases when t
Thanks,
Chris Cheney
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 01:30:42PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 04:20:42PM +0200, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
> > I prepared a policy for the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers Group, the document
> > can be found at http://people.debian.org/~madkiss/debian-kde-policy.html
>
> Hi,
>
>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 09:33:28AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> There are now patches (!) for both bugs.
>
> The sooner kdelibs gets fixed, the sooner the whole of kde can get into
> testing. (The kdebase bug should be downgraded or closed.)
>
> (There is also still the kdemultimedia/glibc i
be available for regular use. Please do not attempt
to commit anything until I send an email to list stating it is ok.
Thanks,
Chris Cheney
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 07:37:04AM +0100, Ben Burton wrote:
> CVS commit by benb:
>
> Force a rerun of automake/etc since the debian patches require it.
>
>
> M +8 -4 rules 1.93
>
>
> --- koffice/debian/rules #1.92:1.93
> @@ -63,7 +63,11 @@
>
> # KDE CVS does not have acl
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 08:06:36PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > This really shouldn't be done like this since it requires autotools for
> > the build environment.
>
> koffice build-depends on automake/etc, so it shouldn't break anything.
This only doesn't break anything as long as automake is
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for kdeadmin 3.1.4-1
M +9 -0 changelog 1.86.2.7
M +59 -3 control 1.80.2.5
M +64 -29rules 1.66.2.5
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for kdegraphics 3.1.4-1
M +12 -2 changelog 1.89.2.8
M +107 -7control 1.84.2.9
M +64 -29rules 1.73.2.5
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for kdenetwork 3.1.4-1
M +9 -0 changelog 1.110.2.6
M +165 -5control 1.91.2.10
M +62 -27rules 1.77.2.7
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for kdepim 3.1.4-1
M +9 -0 changelog 1.70.2.4
M +92 -2 control 1.73.2.8
M +53 -21rules 1.51.2.7
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for kdeutils 3.1.4-1
M +9 -0 changelog 1.81.2.6
M +107 -3control 1.79.2.8
M +60 -25rules 1.63.2.7
for release with sarge or someone else will
take over the mips buildds.
Chris Cheney
[1] - Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:23:03 -0600
arts
---
arm - needs build
m68k- needs build
mips- needs build
mipsel - needs build
sparc - needs build
kdelibs - 6 RC Bugs
The current[1] status of KDE in sid is below. I will be uploading new
kde packages soon with the group/list address as the maintainer. It
appears the mips buildds may actually catch up, they finally built
kdelibs.
Chris Cheney
[1] - Mon, 03 Nov 2003 23:56:55 -0600
arts
---
sparc
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for arts 1.1.4-3
M +7 -0 changelog 1.11.2.9
M +9 -9 control 1.20.2.5
M +5 -0 libarts1-dev.install 1.5.2.5
M +5 -0 libarts1.install 1.4.2.6
M +1 -0 libarts1.manpages 1.1.2.2
M +0 -5 libartsc0-dev.
This list is not intended for users please use debian-kde in the future.
However, if you want to workaround the issue purge k3b first then upgrade
and reinstall k3b from sid. The next version of kdelibs will have the
proper conflict/replaces to keep it from installing with the old k3b.
Chris
sig
Anyone who is going through the bug lists and sends messages intended to
reach the submitter must use [EMAIL PROTECTED] not just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This emails both the bug itself and the submitter,
otherwise the email only goes to the bug log itself. I noticed that
several people have been forgetti
CVS commit by ccheney:
debian packaging updates for kdelibs 3.1.4-3
M +39 -7 changelog 1.221.2.11
M +8 -8 control 1.231.2.14
M +1 -0 kdelibs-bin.install 1.9.2.3
M +1 -0 kdelibs-bin.manpages 1.1.2.3
M +0 -1 kdelibs-data.links 1.2.2.1
M +0 -1 kde
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:23:30AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Several estimates have come and gone, but could we have a new estimate
> anyway? ;-)
After looking at kdebase closer I determined it will take a bit longer
than expected to fix it. There are roughly 55-60 Debian specific bugs on
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:54:34AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:22:43AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:23:30AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > Several estimates have come and gone, but could we have a new esti
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:41:09PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Please, someone upload a kdebase ASAP which fixes at least the known
> installability & building problems. As it is, the metapackage 'kdebase'
> is uninstallable on arm, i386, and mips (and also sh and hurd). kdebase-dev
> isn't
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 03:48:06AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > tags 183702 +moreinfo
> Bug#183702: ftp.debian.org: dist-upgrade triggers massive kde uninstall
> Tags were: sid
> Tags added: moreinfo
Domi,
You didn't send the bug fol
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:59:01PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> > If I understand the KMimeMagic code properly, then what you are trying
> > to accomplish is possible by putting an extra *.magic file in the
> > /etc/kde3/magic
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:25:09AM +0100, Ralf Nolden wrote:
> CVS commit by rnolden:
>
> changing debconf dependency version to woody debconf. changing this on every
> backport sucks.
And isn't even likely to work soon, since kdebase is about to be
converted to using po-debconf... I had hoped t
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:37:31PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> OK. So the buildds are back, the upload queue is working, and the testing
> scripts are running.
Only a couple of the buildds are back, and the last post I saw wrt to
testing (Dec 5) said the testing scripts are still disabled.
Yea, I am working through my list of packages needing updates and will
be uploading kdebase soon. By the way most of the buildds are still not
online so it won't be building and migrating to testing anytime soon. If
I remember correctly testing migration is still disabled anyway.
Chris
signature
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:03:40PM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> On Friday 12 December 2003 13:31, Thomas Zander wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > in the package kdelibs-data the /etc/kderc file is present (its a
> > symlink), this is not very nice s
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:01:29PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:18:16PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:59:01PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Until this is properly documented, the bug should not be closed.
> > >
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 12:55:06AM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looking on http://packages.qa.debian.org/kdebase, it says that
> kdebase is still orphaned. the page for kdelibs has correct
> information about this list maintaining it and such. Does anyone know
> what is the caus
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 02:05:50PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> Isn't this what's in the /usr/share/misc/file directory?
Oops, I didn't notice that since I had just done a dpkg -L file
previously (I think). Thanks for the information.
Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:31:52AM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone happen to have any idea why the new kdebase upload is not
> being accepted ? Is this perhaps somehow still related to the server
> compromise a few weeks ago ?
No, its because I haven't uploaded it yet.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:10:08PM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While packaging some kde apps for woody and I run into some
> annoying problems:
>
> o Some Makefile.am use KDE 3.2 xdg_appsdir and destop
> files end up in /usr/share/applications/kde also for
> kde 3.1
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:23:39AM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode writes:
>
> > ...taps fingers "ASAP" as of two days ago. Any chance this
> > will happen this year?!?
>
> I've been naggin enough, so I'll try to be constructive here :)
>
> The kdebase bugs that I think
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:13:57PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions about how development occurs on the KDE Debian
> packages:
>
> 1. Exactly what is the role of the alioth pkg-kde project ? AFAICT
> from the website, there is no activity there, even the C
Essentially combine what Riku and I said. :)
Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:37:06AM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry that I'm back here whining again, but I don't think we can
> afford to keep this new serious kdm.postinst bug [1] in the packages
> for a few months as before.
>
> Chris, what are your plans on this ? When d
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:13:56PM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> The KDEs 'everything below' prefix and the quirks used in debian to follow
> FHS, do not play well together. Untils we find/agree on an algorithm how
> to handle a KDE installations distrubuted accross
>
> a) FHS (easy ;)
>
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 11:16:10PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
>
> Building kdelibs with dpkg-buildpackage pumps out this error message when
> doing the patches at the beginning
>
> APPLYING PATCH:
> patching file kdm/kfrontend/genkdmconf.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 803 (offset 45 lines).
> Hunk #2
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:37:58AM +0200, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> Anyway, it's been a real pleasure to work with you all, thanks for all
> your time and valuable help.
Thanks domi for all your help with KDE. I hope you have fun in your new
endeavors.
Chris Cheney
signature.asc
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 10:58:23PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> of fixes. I'm beginning to worry that they will miss the sarge release.
http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/
553 RC bugs are still open combined with the fact that the s390 buildd
still isn't
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:13:41PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Sarge is closer than you might think. :-/
Hmm, you may be right after all. However I still don't see anything for
s390 being built and the graph indicates nothing is (notice its
continuous downward sloping). Needless to say arm a
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:55:49PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> For what it's worth, KDE 3.2 is only planned to release on February
> 2nd, so there's still quite some time left. I think it's safe to say
> that the packages won't be uploaded before they're released upstream.
> The question of
As always KDE is being held up by poor buildd maintenance.
Chris
arts
finished
kdeaddons
-
arm - failed - needs retry
kdeadmin
mips- failed - gcc sucks ICE!
kdeartwork
--
arm - no attempt
mips- no attempt
s390- failed - needs retry
kdebase
---
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:52:05PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >kdeutils
> >
> >mips- failed - needs the SYS_sysinfo fix [1]
> ...
> >[1] - Was broken after supposed toolchain freeze by f*cking wonderful
> >toolchain changes.
>
> Yeah, that one sucks a lot; I've noted some other
It sure is nice that freetype made backwards incompatible changes in a
point release! Also looks like the buildds are still having a hard time
keeping up. :<
Chris
arts
finished
kdeaddons
-
arm - failed - needs retry
kdeadmin *
mips- failed - gcc sucks ICE!
kdear
Seems the buildds are still being slow about building stuff. :< There
are currently 3 buggy packages holding up KDE compiles, g++-3.3,
linux-kernel-headers, and libglut3-dev.
10 days until KDE 3.2 is tagged...
Chris
arts
finished
kdeaddons
-
arm - failed - needs retry
kdeadmi
If anyone who runs the m68k or s390 buildds sees this message please get
qt-x11-free to build soon... Since it has arch all and any packages
mixed it causes all other KDE builds to fail until its done.
lamont told me earlier today that kdemultimedia works with the single
line fix so I will be uplo
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:27:44AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:26:27PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:55:49PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> > > I think we all would very much like KDE 3.2 in sarge. I have a newly
>
It appears m68k will be holding up KDE as usual. It still has not built
qt-x11-free even though it was uploaded on Jan 6. Which means it can't
build the rest of KDE until it does.
Please don't upload other packages until kdelibs is finished on at least
all but m68k.
Thanks,
Chris
arts
m68k
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:27:44AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 03:26:27PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:55:49PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
> > > I think we all would very much like KDE 3.2 in sarge. I have a newly
>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:32AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > kdeaddons
> > -
> > wait to upload until all else is finished
>
> FWIW, this is somewhat too great a restriction.
> The kdeaddons module build-depends on kdebase,
> kdemultimedia and kdegames, but IIRC nothing else.
You kn
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:42:00AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:26:32AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> > >
> > > > kdeaddons
> > > > -
> > > > wait to upload until all el
severity 227166 important
tags 227166 + unreproducible
retitle 227166 konqueror: all fonts rendered as boxes under Gnome
stop
I can't reproduce this under KDE so I downgrading it to important. If
anyone has time to attempt to reproduce this under Gnome, please do.
Thanks,
Chris
signature.asc
De
It appears m68k will be holding up KDE as usual. It still has not built
qt-x11-free even though it was uploaded on Jan 6. Which means it can't
build the rest of KDE until it does.
Please don't upload other packages until kdelibs is uploaded for
arm/ia64/s390/sparc. I'm hoping this will happen some
It appears m68k will be holding up KDE as usual. It still has not built
qt-x11-free even though it was uploaded on Jan 6. Which means it can't
build the rest of KDE until it does.
Thanks,
Chris
arts
m68k- failed - needs retry (waiting on qt-x11-free)
kdeaddons
-
wait to upload
retitle 203185 kscreensaver: should depend on kdebase-bin
reassign 203185 kscreensaver
severity 203185 important
stop
Since there are some screensavers in kdebase itself the pam file belongs
in kdebase. So kscreensaver needs to depend on kdebase-bin.
Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
1 - 100 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
