Bug#680547: [kgpg] Works for me

2012-09-03 Thread Matthias Heinz
Package: kgpg Version: 4:4.8.4-3 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi! Yes thanks for the hin. The solution works for me. But I think kgpg should check for this error in the config file an replace it automatically. For a normal user (or one with not much time) it's hard to figu

Processed: [bts-link] source package kdepim

2012-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdepim > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.or

[bts-link] source package kde-workspace

2012-09-03 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kde-workspace # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #664225 (http://bugs.debian.org/664225) # Bug title: plasma-scriptengine-googleg

[bts-link] source package kdepim

2012-09-03 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package kdepim # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #223566 (http://bugs.debian.org/223566) # Bug title: kmail: Needs a way of extracting e

Bug#685823: plasma-widgets-workspace: Application Launcher Kickoff without 'previous menue bar' on the left

2012-09-03 Thread oz
I guess, this report can be closed. In a KDE-Forum I read it is a new feature, not a bug: http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=97206&hilit=kickoff Sorry for wasting your time, greetz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#685823: plasma-widgets-workspace: Application Launcher Kickoff without 'previous menue bar' on the left

2012-09-03 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Mon 03 Sep 2012 15:01:07 oz escribió: > I guess, this report can be closed. In a KDE-Forum I read it is a new > feature, not a bug: > > http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=97206&hilit=kickoff > > Sorry for wasting your time, Thank you for giving us the feedback! This kind of things happ

Bug#686483: forwarded 686483

2012-09-03 Thread Soren Stoutner
forwarded 686483 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306228 -- Soren Stoutner 623-262-6169 so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: forwarded 686483

2012-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 686483 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306228 Bug #686483 [kscreensaver-xsavers] kscreensaver-xsavers does not allow access to xscreensavers advanced options Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306

Bug#686632: Packaging Fault: kgpg should depend on some version of gpg

2012-09-03 Thread Nick Boyce
Package: kgpg Version: 4:4.4.5-1+squeeze1 Severity: minor Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nick Boyce To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: Packaging Fault: kgpg should depend on some version of gpg Message-ID: <2012090403583