Le Dim 10 Avril 2005 20:33, Nick Leverton a écrit :
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:22:11PM +0100, Nick Boyce wrote:
> > I realise you're only talking about default-setting here, but I've
> > noticed that KDE already looks a lot better at 1024x768 than at
> > 800x600 ... as if the higher resolutions a
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:22:11PM +0100, Nick Boyce wrote:
> I realise you're only talking about default-setting here, but I've
> noticed that KDE already looks a lot better at 1024x768 than at
> 800x600 ... as if the higher resolutions are being "designed in".
I am not sure of the dot pitch on
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:16:26 -0400, Christopher Martin wrote:
> A 17" display, 16" viewale, at 1024x768 is ~80 dpi, but most people
> probably run at 1280x1024,
Just FYI, since you asked for feedback (and because most of my
colleagues say the same as you): I use 17" monitors everywhere, and I
r
> > exists (antialiasing is a pain for monospace fonts in my vim IMHO)
>
> konsole and antialiasing isn't a goot idea I fully agree.
Just to state a different opinion; I like it very much.
*/ Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Friday 08 April 2005 12:16 pm, Christopher Martin wrote:
> I still want feedback on the new defaults, but please do include your
> display size, resolution, etc.
The defaults you have chosen match the sizes I currently use (10pt). My DPI
is set to the actual DPI (80 x 81 px on a monitor with
On Friday 08 April 2005 22:28, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > With scalable fonts and TFTs dpi tweaking is stupid (IMO or course).
> the point is I use bitmap fonts for monospace fonts in my terminals, and
> I can assure you the dpi is quite important then ;)
>
> give me a nice looking monospaced fon
> With scalable fonts and TFTs dpi tweaking is stupid (IMO or course).
the point is I use bitmap fonts for monospace fonts in my terminals, and
I can assure you the dpi is quite important then ;)
give me a nice looking monospaced font ... and I'll see. but it does not
exists (antialiasing is a p
On Friday 08 April 2005 17:22, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> > afaik, when using kdm, dpi is guessed by X.
> > my dpi was read on my both screens (the physical ones) and resulted in
> > x-dpi and y-dpi (I mean the horiz and vertical dpi weren't the same).
> >
> > maybe then
On April 8, 2005 10:44, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I think you have a tough job adjusting the fonts, since it heavily
> depents on the dpi-setting of the system. The main problem here (often
> heard in debian.user.german) is, that kdm uses 75dpi by default but
> startx starts with 100dpi.
> But i *t
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> afaik, when using kdm, dpi is guessed by X.
> my dpi was read on my both screens (the physical ones) and resulted in
> x-dpi and y-dpi (I mean the horiz and vertical dpi weren't the same).
>
> maybe then if fallbacks to 75dpi if no information is found on the
> hardware .
Christopher Martin wrote:
> On April 8, 2005 03:22, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> I think someone has forgotten to set the fontsizes right - there are all
>> a bi too small
>
> These defaults are pretty much the same as used by GNOME (which is pretty
> good at setting defaults, but they also by defau
afaik, when using kdm, dpi is guessed by X.
my dpi was read on my both screens (the physical ones) and resulted in
x-dpi and y-dpi (I mean the horiz and vertical dpi weren't the same).
maybe then if fallbacks to 75dpi if no information is found on the
hardware ...
Personnaly I *manually* force
12 matches
Mail list logo
