Re: Comments regarding calligra_2.8.5.repack-1_amd64.changes

2014-09-05 Thread Maximiliano Curia
¡Hola Thorsten! El 2014-09-05 a las 13:08 +0200, Thorsten Alteholz escribió: > >Please don't reject just because of that, calligra can be perfectly > >binNMUed on amd64 once it has been accepted. Reuploading means going > >to the NEW queue _again_. > But it doesn't matter which version needs to g

Re: Comments regarding calligra_2.8.5.repack-1_amd64.changes

2014-09-05 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Pino Toscano wrote: NO! too late ... Please don't reject just because of that, calligra can be perfectly binNMUed on amd64 once it has been accepted. Reuploading means going to the NEW queue _again_. But it doesn't matter which version needs to go through NEW, does it?

Re: Comments regarding calligra_2.8.5.repack-1_amd64.changes

2014-09-05 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, On 2014-09-05 12:17, Maximiliano Curia wrote: El 2014-07-29 a las 11:24 +, Thorsten Alteholz escribió: Dear Maintainer, your debian/copyright definitely needs some rework. I found files licensed under the Apache licene: e.g. 3rdparty/google-breakpad/src/third_party/protobuf/protobu

Re: Comments regarding calligra_2.8.5.repack-1_amd64.changes

2014-09-05 Thread Maximiliano Curia
¡Hola Thorsten! El 2014-07-29 a las 11:24 +, Thorsten Alteholz escribió: > Dear Maintainer, > > your debian/copyright definitely needs some rework. I found files licensed > under the Apache licene: > e.g. > 3rdparty/google-breakpad/src/third_party/protobuf/protobuf/gtest/scripts/upload.py >