Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-02-06 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Saturday 06 February 2016 21:03:05 Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Saturday 06 February 2016 14:35:56 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > >Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name? > > >Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for > > >libindi0b and libindi-dev on hur

Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-02-06 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Saturday 06 February 2016 14:35:56 Scott Kitterman wrote: > >Maybe the 'issue' is that libindi is the source package name? > >Another explanation could be that there is a version 0.9.7-1 for > >libindi0b and libindi-dev on hurd-i386. > > That would do it. You might want to file a architecture

Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On February 6, 2016 2:31:02 PM EST, Diederik de Haas wrote: >On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:23:27 +0100 Maximiliano Curia > >wrote: >> Version: 0.9.8-4 >> >> On 08/01/16 19:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> > Package: libindi >> > Version: 0.9.7-1 >> > Severity: wishlist >> > >> > libindi has a build-depen

Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-02-06 Thread Diederik de Haas
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:23:27 +0100 Maximiliano Curia wrote: > Version: 0.9.8-4 > > On 08/01/16 19:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Package: libindi > > Version: 0.9.7-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > libindi has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream > > has released a new major ver

Bug#810436: libindi: please switch to libusb 1.0

2016-01-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Package: libindi Version: 0.9.7-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, libindi has a build-depends on libusb-dev. A few years ago upstream has released a new major version libusb 1.0 with a different API which aims to fix design deficiencies with USB 2.0 and 3.0 in mind. The old libusb 0.1 packag