Control: reassign 766462 gdm3
Control: affects 766462 kdm wdm plymouth
Control: tags 766462 = patch pending
On 01/03/15 21:58, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Cc kdm, lightdm, slim, wdm maintainers to warn you that you might be
> getting a RC bug (with a simple fix, add one 3-line file) assigned or
> clon
On mar., 2015-03-10 at 10:02 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > slim and lightdm do have native systemd .service files, but don't have
> > those relationships, which I think is probably a bug in those DMs'
> > service files
>
> If they do not interact with plymouth themselves like gdm does, then it
On 01/03/15 21:58, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2014 at 12:11:49 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>> This bug is triggered by the fact that GDM systemd service is enabled
>> while KDM is also enabled. GDM .service file explicitly conflicts with
>> plymouth-quit.service as it calls "plymou
On mar., 2015-03-03 at 09:59 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> * have systemd as init
> * install plymouth, gdm3 and your favourite non-GDM DM implementation
> (kdm in the original bug report)
Ok, I'm missing gdm3 here, so I'll try to install it and report back on
the situation.
> * select the non
On 03/03/15 09:52, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2015-03-03 at 03:59 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> IMHO, if gettys don't come up properly, the system is rather broken
>> and this is a no-go for jessie.
>
> Sure, but I had the impression that this wasn't the case for lightdm
> (and slim), a
On mar., 2015-03-03 at 03:59 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> I am quite positive that some missing gettys because of two DMs being
> installed in parallel (or some similar normal thing that people might
> do) will definitely be worth a freeze exception.
>
> IMHO, if gettys don't come up properly,
Hi all, hi Yves-Alexis,
On Mo 02 Mär 2015 21:30:49 CET, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On dim., 2015-03-01 at 21:58 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
slim and lightdm do have native systemd .service files, but don't have
those relationships, which I think is probably a bug in those DMs'
service files; t
On dim., 2015-03-01 at 21:58 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> slim and lightdm do have native systemd .service files, but don't have
> those relationships, which I think is probably a bug in those DMs'
> service files; they should probably gain those lines too. However,
> because they participate in
Cc kdm, lightdm, slim, wdm maintainers to warn you that you might be
getting a RC bug (with a simple fix, add one 3-line file) assigned or
cloned to your DM implementations.
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I just upgraded to jessie, and with plymouth installed, I don't get
> any gettys/login prompts on a
9 matches
Mail list logo
