Hi,
> > - Supposedly, neither virtuoso nor nepomuk is the right place to
> > report the bug.
> > So, what is the right place then? I hope you do not deny that there
> > is a problem which needs to be fixed.
>
> You assume the way to fix things is "reporting a bug somewhere", which
> isn't.
> Virt
Alle mercoledì 9 maggio 2012, Ralf Jung ha scritto:
> > So? Anything in the dependency stack below KDE can have bad effects
> > on KDE (say Qt, GNU libc, the kernel, ...).
>
> I understand your point, but please consider the following:
> - There is a problem somewhere, since Nepomuk does not work
Hi,
> kde-runtime has already a recommend on virtuoso, and it's more than
> enough given that
> a) any KDE application depend on kde-runtime
> b) the semantic desktop is an *optional* feature
>
> So no, an hard dependency will *not* be added.
That's unfortunate, but understood.
> So? Anything in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 671391 671944
Bug #671391 [kde-runtime] kde-runtime: Nepomuk should depend on virtuoso
Bug #671944 [kde-runtime] kde-runtime: Virtuoso entirely missing from testing,
making
Severity set to 'important' from 'minor'
Merged 671391 671944
forcemerge 671391 671944
tag 671391 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
Alle mercoledì 9 maggio 2012, Ralf Jung ha scritto:
> reassign 671391 kde-runtime 4:4.7.4-2
> retitle 671391 kde-runtime: Nepomuk should depend on virtuoso
> reassign 671944 kde-runtime 4:4.7.4-2
> retitle 671944 kde-runtime: Virtuoso entir
reassign 671391 kde-runtime 4:4.7.4-2
retitle 671391 kde-runtime: Nepomuk should depend on virtuoso
reassign 671944 kde-runtime 4:4.7.4-2
retitle 671944 kde-runtime: Virtuoso entirely missing from testing, making
Nepomuk unusable
servety 671944 important
thanks
Re-assigning these bugs to the pack
6 matches
Mail list logo
