Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-10 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi, Adrian Bunk writes: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:48:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >> it would still not be DFSG-free, because it >> fails the "desert island test" for snail mail. Were OmniTI Computer >> Consulting would accept email, it would also fail the "dissident test". > > Th

Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:48:31PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Adrian, Hi Nicholas, >... > Did you read the text at that link? yes. > "it *does* cause practical > problems, including incompatibility with the GNU GPL [emphasis mine]" DFSG free code does not have to be GPL compatible.

Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-10 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk writes: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:32PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> Adrian Bunk writes: >> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> >>... >> >> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be >> >> used

Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 06:33:32PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > Adrian Bunk writes: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > >>... > >> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be > >> used to endorse or promote

Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-10 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk writes: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >>... >> * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be used >> to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific >> prior written permission. >

Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:38:57PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >... > * Neither name of the company nor the names of its contributors may be used > to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific > prior written permission. > > I'm not 100% certain that bundling d

Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-10 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
At the very least, it appears that the advertising clauses make dprof2calltree not DFSG-free, because they fail the "desert island test".

Bug#964815: it looks like dprof2calltree cannot be distributed with a GPL-2 work

2020-07-10 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Package: kcachegrind-converters Version: 4:17.08.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Forwarded: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424078 While preparing to import the new upstream release (https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kcachegrind/-/merge_requests/3) I did a copyright review, and

Processed: bug 936783 is forwarded to https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424077

2020-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 936783 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424077 Bug #936783 [src:kcachegrind] kcachegrind: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424077'. > thanks Stopping processing her

Processed: Re: Bug#936783: kcachegrind: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #936783 [src:kcachegrind] kcachegrind: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) patch. -- 936783: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936783 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#936783: kcachegrind: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-07-10 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Control: tag -1 patch Hi, John Scott writes: > Python 3 doesn't include hotshot, so the hotshot2calltree script should be > dropped. Upstream still includes it but it doesn't appear to have seen any > maintenance: > https://invent.kde.org/sdk/kcachegrind/-/tree/master/converters I've filed a

Bug#943340: qtscript-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: segfaults in the testsuite

2020-07-10 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:49:57PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > > "Warning: This module is not actively developed. It is provided for > > backwards > > ah, okay. It’s depended on by some things, pyqt5 IIRC, which is > why I thought it more important. I’ve uploaded with nocheck fo

Bug#943340: qtscript-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: segfaults in the testsuite

2020-07-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi Dmitry, > "Warning: This module is not actively developed. It is provided for backwards ah, okay. It’s depended on by some things, pyqt5 IIRC, which is why I thought it more important. I’ve uploaded with nocheck for now. Thanks, //mirabilos -- «MyISAM tables -will- get corrupted eventually.

Bug#943340: qtscript-opensource-src: FTBFS on x32: segfaults in the testsuite

2020-07-10 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi Thorsten! On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 09:37:03PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Version: 5.14.2+dfsg-2 > > Still pertinent. The current status of Qt Script is documented here: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtscript-index.html "Warning: This module is not actively developed. It is provided for backward