Hi Andreas!
El lun., 6 de ago. de 2018 17:45, Andreas Ferber <
af+debian-bugregpo...@chaos-agency.de> escribió:
> Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src
> Version: 5.11.1+dfsg-5
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> when trying to build the package on stretch (with various backports), it
> fails with the fo
Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src
Version: 5.11.1+dfsg-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
when building the package on stable (plus various backports), I got the
following error:
--
../../3rdparty/chromium/components/url_formatter/idn_spoof_checker.cc: In
member function 'bool
url_formatter::
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 17:26:59 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
escribió:
[snip]
> /me facepalms
>
> Ah, indeed, my bad! It's frameworks, not PIM. Sorry about that.
Paul, RT: my most sincere apologies. I don't know how but I got to mix
frameworks with PIM. Frameworks is indeed an
Source: qtwebengine-opensource-src
Version: 5.11.1+dfsg-5
Severity: normal
Hi,
when trying to build the package on stretch (with various backports), it
fails with the following error:
--
../../3rdparty/chromium/media/ffmpeg/ffmpeg_common.cc: In function
'media::VideoCodec media::Cod
El lun., 6 de ago. de 2018 17:23, Sandro Knauß escribió:
> Hey,
>
> > That's totally understandable from your part. Now the test has clearly
> > failed. The regression could either be in Qt or in some part of the KDE
> PIM
> > stack (not the meta package).
>
> ktexteditor is KDE Frameworks and no
Hey,
> That's totally understandable from your part. Now the test has clearly
> failed. The regression could either be in Qt or in some part of the KDE PIM
> stack (not the meta package).
ktexteditor is KDE Frameworks and not KDE PIM. For KDE PIM the argument of not
being up-to-date and not bein
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 15:34:02 -03 Paul Gevers escribió:
> Dear all,
Hi Paul :-)
> To be sure, I don't want to block/delay anything here, I just want
> autopkgtests to be taken seriously. If you as the maintainer of
> ktexteditor say please ignore my test for migration, who am I to say
>
Dear all,
To be sure, I don't want to block/delay anything here, I just want
autopkgtests to be taken seriously. If you as the maintainer of
ktexteditor say please ignore my test for migration, who am I to say
you're wrong. However, you have also added that test for a reason.
On 06-08-18 15:33, L
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:krita
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #905032 (http://bugs.debian.org/905032
Dear Lisandro,
On 06-08-18 13:35, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On one side Maxy told me that many autopkg tests would need fixing due to, if
> my mind does not fails, gcc 8.
It may have slipped in, because the autopkgtests were so much broken for
a while that I didn't check caref
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 09:39:48 -03 Paul Gevers escribió:
> Dear Lisandro,
>
> On 06-08-18 13:35, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > On one side Maxy told me that many autopkg tests would need fixing due to,
> > if my mind does not fails, gcc 8.
>
> It may have slipped in, beca
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 06:28:21 -03 Paul Gevers escribió:
> Dear all,
>
> On 06-08-18 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Could you please confirm that the autopkgtest regression for
> > ktexteditor (marked on the excuses for qtbase-opensource-src) is benign?
>
> I believe there is a regressio
Dear all,
On 06-08-18 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Could you please confirm that the autopkgtest regression for
> ktexteditor (marked on the excuses for qtbase-opensource-src) is benign?
I believe there is a regression, at least in the autopkgtest. I filed
bug 905559 for that already.
Paul
htt
Hi,
according to upstream author, there is (most likely) nothing to be fixed
upstream. The mentioned issue strongly depends on user's custom (local file)
settings as well as the CUPS-API (which is another topic, I guess)...
Please read yourself... ;-)
Regards, Gerardo
Source: ktexteditor
Version: 5.47.0-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Dear maintainers,
After the recent qt transitions and the fixing of all the fall-out by
uploading a new version of abi-compliance-checker, the autopkgtest of
ktexteditor remains failing in unstable and t
15 matches
Mail list logo
