Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers. > > I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and adde

Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > > Rober

Bug#1029108: tuxguitar: limit build architectures

2023-01-17 Thread tony mancill
Package: tuxguitar Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-1 Severity: important tuxguitar is FTBFS on multiple architectures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=tuxguitar&ver=1.5.6%2Bdfsg1-1 We should either address the FTBFS or limit the build architectures in the next upload.

Bug#1029108: tuxguitar: limit build architectures

2023-01-17 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:59:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > Package: tuxguitar > Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-1 > Severity: important > > tuxguitar is FTBFS on multiple architectures: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=tuxguitar&ver=1.5.6%2Bdfsg1-1 > &g

Bug#1029476: tuxguitar: arch-any build fails with current build system

2023-01-22 Thread tony mancill
Package: tuxguitar Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-3 Severity: important The build system doesn't correctly build the arch-any packages when only the arch specific targets are invoked. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1029476: tuxguitar: arch-any build fails with current build system

2023-01-22 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 05:48:21PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > Package: tuxguitar > Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-3 > Severity: important > > The build system doesn't correctly build the arch-any packages when only > the arch specific targets are invoked. In the interest of g

Bug#1029476: tuxguitar: arch-any build fails with current build system

2023-01-24 Thread tony mancill
Hi Helmar, On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:39:52PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > According to the log the error happens at > > Command: dpkg-buildpackage --sanitize-env -us -uc -mamd64 / i386 Build Daemon > (x86-ubc-01) -B -rfakeroot > --changes-option=-O../tuxguitar_1.5.6+dfsg1-3_amd64-buildd.cha

Bug#1029622: tuxguitar-alsa fails to install

2023-01-26 Thread tony mancill
Hi Helmar, On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:45:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > Hi Tony, > > sorry for causing so much work with tuxguitar, and thanks for your efforts! No worries at all! You've done a lot of work on the package, so we will get it ironed out in time for the release. > Do you thin

Bug#1029622: tuxguitar-alsa fails to install

2023-01-26 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:45:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > Hi Tony, > > sorry for causing so much work with tuxguitar, and thanks for your efforts! > > Do you think it would make sense to merge all the tuxguitar* packages into > one package tuxguitar with arch-any? Maybe this would solve

Bug#1043253: tuxguitar: Missing java class ZipArchiveInputStream when opening .gp files

2023-08-07 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:51:51PM +0200, Jérôme Lafréchoux wrote: > Package: tuxguitar > Version: 1.5.6+dfsg1-6 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I get a missing java class error when opening .gp files. > > I can open .gpx and .gp5 files but all .gp files fail with the following > err

Re: Packages removing alternatives on upgrade

2012-10-06 Thread tony mancill
On 09/23/2012 08:40 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote: >> Jakub Wilk writes: > > [Cross-posting to packages@qa, for elvis is maintained by the QA > group.] > > > Many packages remove alternatives on upgrade, only to re-add them > > later, potentially discarding manual choices of the user.

Bug#594881: anymeal: Remove dependency on aRTS

2010-08-30 Thread tony mancill
On 08/30/2010 06:11 AM, Bilal Akhtar wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 13:52 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >> Given the attached patch only disable aRts support, what features >> actually removes from the package? >> > > No features get removed from the package, as I have tested in Ubuntu. Hi Bilal,

Bug#513432: backtrace generated when pasting into nedit

2009-01-28 Thread Tony Mancill
Package: nedit Version: 1:5.5-3 Severity: minor Whenever I paste into nedit, the following is dumped to the shell. Interestingly enough, the paste is successful. Please let me know if I can provide any other information. From what I can tell, this is distinct from the other copy and paste issue

Bug#948119: [schroot] does not work for non-root user

2020-01-04 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 09:35:27AM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > I suspect the problem might be related to the fact that /usr/bin/schroot > is not set-uid anymore, while it was before. Executing > ... I ran into this as well and verified on another system running sid that the binary update t

Bug#948119: [schroot] does not work for non-root user

2020-01-05 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 09:32:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > It is a latent bug in debian/rules, which failed to run the install-arch: > target when run under dpkg-buildpackage -b (instead of -B), which is how I > did my test build for upload to the archive. > > I was surprised to find that t

Bug#1001750: RFA: fwlogwatch -- Taking over maintenance of this project

2021-12-15 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:37:09AM +, Clar3nce wrote: > Package: fwlogwatch > > Hi guys, > i Would be interested in taking over maintenance of the fwlogwatch project > moving forward as i think that it is a cool idea and would love to see it > continue to be updated to support a larger array