eyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pwget
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ontact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=xoreos-tools
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: gnome-shell-extension-weather
Version: 0~20170402.git34506a6-2
Followup-For: Bug #969273
Control: retitle -1 gnome-shell-extension-weather: fails to load: TypeError:
this.actor.reparent is not a function
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: usertags -1 + bittenby
I have this issue too a
ntrol, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=link-grammar
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 12:37 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> updating from the latest HEAD of:
> https://gitlab.com/jenslody/gnome-shell-extension-openweather I do see it
> working but I get exclamation mark with the icons as in the attached
> screenshot. Not sure if this is what is expected. I can
t built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] http
ds the maintainers of the affected packages would be very
appreciated.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Mike,
All bugs have caused the packages to be on the list for autoremoval. It
seems there is one bug to be filed still, can you please do that?
Paul
elbrus@coccia:~$ dak rm --no-action -R --suite testing libappindicator
Will remove the following packages from testing:
gir1.2-appindicator
n.
I copied the output at the bottom of this report. Can you please look
into it and make the test more robust (against network issues). If you
keep the test that requires internet, you should add the needs-internet
restriction too.
Paul
[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/9/9base/testing/i386/
Hi,
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:28:06 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> shoogle has an autopkgtest, great. However, on i386 it fails more often
^^^ oops, that's what you get for reusing an old mail.
> I copied the output at the bottom of this report. Can you please look
> into it and
Hi all,
For documentation, I log our IRC conversation here.
[20:24:27] elbrus et al: just in case you have already seen
santiago_ 's email: what's your thought on #959022
[20:24:38] [zwiebelbot] Debian#959022: cgroup-tools: does not work in
cgroup2 / unified hierarchy - https://bugs.debian.org/9
in the
release policy [2]
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=xdemorse
[2] https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy
Control: tags -1 + sid
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 12:14:21 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> quesoglc fails to build from source in unstable.
This seems to have been caused by the update to autoconf, it does not
occur with bookworm and upgrading autoconf to sid causes the issue.
Looking at the config.log, t
user autoc...@packages.debian.org
usertags 993870 + autoconf-2.71
thanks
user autoc...@packages.debian.org
usertags 993870 - autoconf-2.71
thanks
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> Is this just how apt-build works or could this be a security issue due
> to installing unauthenticated packages?
This is a security issue, please take a look at this page:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.ht
a shame to see unstable
out of sync before we release!
If the reason you've not built a Python 3 module is due to the dependency
chain below you, just let me know, and I can add it to our list, or feel
free to file a bug in coordination with the team!
Have a great day, and thanks for
7;d be a shame to see unstable
out of sync before we release!
If the reason you've not built a Python 3 module is due to the dependency
chain below you, just let me know, and I can add it to our list, or feel
free to file a bug in coordination with the team!
Have a great day, and thanks
esitate to file them as wish list
bugs. Also contributions (even directly to the collab-maint repository
[2] if well documented or discussed) are welcome.
[1] https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/190/using-dbconfig-common/
[2] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/dbconfig-common.
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:19:57 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I see this bug tagged as pending. ... please explain the fix.
Looks like you missed the explanation provided in the tag pending:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=9;bug=717536
# Source package in NEW: http://packages.
and Latin America. Our company successfully provides services
to corporations like MTV, Sirius XM or Thomson Reuters, in addition to many
startups and small companies.
Do you have any current IT need in which we could help? We’d love to work with
you and your company.
Thanks,
Paul Azorin
Package: acheck
Version: 0.5.2
Severity: normal
Currently the bash_completion file is installed in the doc directory
but should be installed in the bash-completion completions directory.
/usr/share/doc/acheck/bash_completion
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/acheck
-- System Information:
De
sn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] h
age(s)
aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that uplo
sn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] h
report.
Currently this regression is blocking the migration to testing [1]. Can
you please investigate the situation and fix it?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https
nately the Debian infrastructure
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-de
inary package(s)
aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that uplo
is, please ensure you're testing the as-installed
binary instead of the code in the source tree, as the intention of
autopkgtest is to test the package, not the source, as I believe you're
not testing /usr/bin/grepmail
Paul
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers t
Hi Eriberto,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:57:37 -0300 Eriberto wrote:
> Thanks a lot Paul.
Please be aware that in the BTS bug submitters normally don't get mails
to the bugs they submit (unless they are subscribed). It's coincidence
that I see your message.
> Really, in our machine
the issue isn't fixed. Obviously, the package can come back later too,
but just so you know.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=httpbin
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: adequate
Version: 0.15.6
Severity: normal
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: retitle -2 adequate: check systemd files for invalid users/groups
Control: retitle -3 adequate: check init scripts for invalid users/groups
dbus files, systemd units and init scripts can reference users or
groups.
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-hg/issues/48
On Sat, 2022-02-19 at 07:31 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
This appears to be caused by git 1:2.35.1-1 in unstable,
the autopkgtests regressed
ds to be updated.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/1006836
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python3-defaults
https://ci.debian.net
7;t need to take the sole ownership
(which you apparently didn't want) but can still easily keep an eye on
it (and continue the work to package 1.10.7).
Paul
[1]
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/e1nkesg-00066x...@quantz.debian.org
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[0] You can see what packages were added from the second line of the log
file quoted below. The migration software adds source package from
unstable to the list if they are needed to install packages from
python-svg.path/6.0-1. I.e. due to
ge is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=directfb
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
alled in a
testing environment.
You can close the bug once your package has been removed from testing.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
into wish:
package require BLT
pack [blt::hiertable .choose]
Note that the xbm files are installed by blt-demo,
so you won't notice the error if you have blt-demo
in your distribution.
Paul Kienzle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: multi-gnome-terminal
Version: 1.6.2-2
Severity: normal
Here is what happens when I try to remove the package:
<- snip >
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/acpi# dpkg --purge multi-gnome-terminal
(Reading database ... 199313 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing multi-gnome-term
Package: fastforward-src
Version: 0.51-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
elysium:/tmp/fastforward# newaliases
ld.so: Incorrectly built binary which accesses errno or h_errno
directly.
ld.so: See /usr/share/doc/libc6/FAQ.gz.
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library:
-- Sy
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=gnubg
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for gnubg (1.07.001-3 to 1.08.003-1): BLOCKED: Cannot
migrate due to another item, which is blocked (please c
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=emscripten
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for emscripten (3.1.6~dfsg-9 to 3.1.66~dfsg-2):
BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/in
EXPORTED_FUNCTIONS if it arrives from a system library
Error: Aborting compilation due to previous errors
emcc: error: '/usr/bin/node /usr/share/emscripten/src/compiler.mjs
/tmp/tmpinds__jv.json' failed (returned 1)
"""
Paul
[1]
https://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/dist
e/emscripten/emrun.py
so this will also need fixing.
Upstream dropped the executable flag, so maybe it's not meant to be
called directly. /usr/bin/emcc calls it as an argument to $python.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(who knows) maybe help?
Also, I'm seeing your discussing upstream (without much immediate success).
Seems like emscripten is a bit of a bad fit for Debian, especially as
it's in the key package set.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
r compatibility.
More than one month has passed, and I'm pondering how to move forward.
Should we take your changes and apply them on an older version of
emscripten that works with the (highest) llvm we have in Debian at this
moment?
Any better ideas?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descript
ckage is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent
manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the
process, please reach out to
Package: local-apt-repository
Version: 0.9
Severity: normal
File: /usr/lib/local-apt-repository/local-apt-repository.list
Usertags: warnings
A recent update to apt is complaining about the local-apt-repository
apt sources file being non-modern. It looks very easy to fix:
$ sudo apt-get update
, and as a consequence all its reverse (build) dependencies. The
bad shape of emscript is the last piece blocking the removal of
llvm-toolchain-15 which we don't want to ship in trixie.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
content or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=dadadodo
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for dadadodo (1.04-9 to 1.04-10): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migrat
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 15:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
ruby-shoulda-context
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
ruby-shoulda-context migrates).
ruby-shoulda-context fails its own autopkgtest everywhere.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Package: binfmtc
Version: 0.17-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to install
Hi,
I just saw this on one of my hosts:
$ sudo apt install -f
Summary:
Upgrading: 0, Installing: 0, Removing: 0, Not Upgrading: 427
1 not fully installed or removed.
Space needed: 0 B / 140 GB available
Se
he progress here? Maybe it's best to revert src:pry to the
version we have in testing? It seems that it was updated too late in the
trixie release cycle.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David (Plasma) Paul"
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 21:48:17 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Fix #678437 and simplify debian/rules
---
debian/changelog | 31 +++
debian/control | 10 +-
debian/mp3blas
acious[2] which is still actively maintained and a part of Debian,
though it's probably slightly different than what you are used to.
Still, I suggest you try it out. :)
Kind regards,
Paul
1: http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/beep-media-player.html
2: http://packages.debian.org/lenny/audacio
esting RC bug of
the week. ^_^
--
Paul "TBBle" Hampson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shorter .sig for a more eco-friendly paperless office.
pgpu48JHsNKPW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-leap
wpa2-peap
wpa2-peap-no-domain
wep-hex
wep-passphrase
wep-shared
leap
ttls
eap
peap
peap-tkip
eap-tls
psu
-- debconf information:
* wicd/users:
--
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
leon...@leonerd.org.uk | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/
Package: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.49-1.1
Severity: minor
If 10-ssl.conf is enabled, starting lighttpd creates a warning:
(configfile.c.60) Warning: please add "mod_openssl" to server.modules
list in lighttpd.conf. A future release of lighttpd 1.4.x *will not*
automatically load mod_openss
But if I understand correctly, those are informational, and not
indicating an error.
When I remove that ifquery condition, I no longer encounter the
problem, even after letting this machine reboot in a loop all night.
I'm attaching my modified version of the script.
Do you think this fix could be
close 715163
thanks
libgphoto2 has been fixed for kfreebsd-* now, therefore closing. If
the build-dep for sane-backends on kfreebsd-* should still be
unsatisfiable, just re-open the bug.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glau
stream issue.
I just came back from a trip to the US and need to catch up
a lot, but I will take care of the forwarding.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-b
ry sorry for not getting back to you earlier!
This is great news and I highly appreciate your efforts, thank you very
much for helping to resolve this issue.
We should try to communicate this upstream, but in any case we could
include a reviewed version of your patch in the Debian package.
Again,
lse code blocks which can't work since
the logic flow will never reach the code block after the second 'else'.
Your patch needs to be revised.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Be
Hi,
there has also been an upstream bug report filed [1].
Might be reasonable to check back there from time to time. No patch
yet, unfortunately.
Cheers,
Adrian
> [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/openslp/bugs/122/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian
Hi Remi,
I forwarded your request to sane-devel [1] which is a better place
for reporting such changes.
Cheers,
Adrian
> [1]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2013-July/031453.html
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - g
ttp://www.gjaeger.de/scanner/plustek/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Guido Günther schreef:
> reassign 579950 iceowl-l10n
>
> Hi Paul,
Hi Guido,
> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 04:16:25PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> Please add localization support for iceowl-extension. iceowl-l10n is only for
>> iceowl and not for iceowl-extention.
Guido Günther schreef:
> Hi Paul,
> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 08:13:12PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> Guido Günther schreef:
>>> reassign 579950 iceowl-l10n
>>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>> Hi Guido,
>>
>>> On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 04:16:25PM
On 12/10/2016 11:01 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 03:03:43 + John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>>* Add Modify_tagged_pointer_structure_js1.8.5.patch to modify tagged
>> pointer to use 48 bit virtual address space (Closes: #839048).
>
js has to be fixed with a kluge like the patch that
> Zheng Xu sent, not the upstream change.
I agree. But I also think that the ABI break was not intentional.
Adrian
> [1] https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dfaafbaaa291
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :&#
On 12/11/2016 03:24 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> libmozjs185 appears to have been broken in the same way.
>
> Is it? As far as I know, the patch was not merged to src:mozjs.
To be more precise: I merged the patch that Zheng attached to the
bug report which is differ
ht be possible that either the server (mldonkey) or the client
(kmldonkey) need
to be updated after a change in either of the two components.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - g
to fix this, please disable LLVM support in doxygen on alpha.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B
that's really a question for the
cmus users and maintainer to decide where the value lies.
Adrian
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675610
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
such problems in future releases.
Again, if you need ROAR audio in cmus, just rebuild the package
yourself. It's not magic and would save you and us a lot of time
and nerves.
Thanks,
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debi
install it just because of cmus.
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-
aubitz@ikarus:~$ aptitude why libslp1
i cmus Recommends libroar2
i A libroar2 Dependslibslp1
glaubitz@ikarus:~$
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin
and the fact that DECnet is no longer
maintained means that ROAR is permanently at risk being affected
by RC bugs unless you think you can fix vulnerabilities or
other serious bug in an ancient networking stack.
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer -
23027
Patrick, why are you so incredibly stubborn and refuse to accept
that no one wants to have DECnet packages installed on their
system when they want to use ROAR or cmus?
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'
heezy as the cmus
version there was compiled without ROAR support.
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 742
Cnet support is essential.
Adrian
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675610
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84
d that libdnet
is not a dependency which is simply untrue) and you apparently
have never heard that Debian does, in fact, remove packages
that are either buggy or no longer in active upstream
development.
We may really need to forward this to the technical committee
and ask them to make a deci
t;--with-suggests" were regarding the case that
Alessio would drop libroar2 from Recommends to Suggests.
Currently cmus is definitely getting stuck on a _fresh_ install, simply
by installing with "apt-get install cmus".
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubit
(or was it ever)?
No. I never claimed that.
> If so, you will need to figure out how that got installed, and I am
> quite certain the cause is *not* cmus and therefore this bugreport
> against cmus is bogus.
It isn't bogus because, as several people have explained several ti
27;s apparent
that no one is going to pick it up anywhere soon - are to be removed
from Debian.
I mean, are you going to adopt the DECnet-related packages?
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitae
a folk skrev før to du svarer eposten!
Adrian
- --
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/21/2015 02:36 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-06-20 15:16:28)
>> You are still trying to boil this down to the mere problem with
>> cmus,
>
> This bugreport is filed against cmus
an ancient networking protocol stack
is a no-brainer and with all the users complaining about it,
you could have at least provided a comment that you're working
on it if not already fixed it.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debia
d64&ver=0.83-6&stamp=1448438596
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Control: merge 806192 806204
Hi Arthur!
I already filed this as #806192 [1], thus merging both bug report.
Please always check existing bug reports before filing a new one
to avoid duplicates.
Cheers,
Adrian
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806192
--
.''
201 - 293 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
