Control: owner -1 !
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 04:26:25PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: coinor-vol
> Version: 1.5.4-1
> Severity: severity
> Justification: missing source
>
> coinor-vol includes a configure script generated using autoconf. The
> relevant configure.ac file is included in the
Looks like I misread the bug report and thought it to be the same as
missing source for NEW upload. I will check about the source for the
configure script.
--
Regards
Sudip
I tried it on a qemu image for aarch64 and could not reproduce the probem,
and there was no error in dmesg.
root@debian-arm64:/home/sudip# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
Release:10
Codename: buster
roo
Thanks for testing and debugging it.
Can you please send me your dmesg which shows the trace.
--
Regards
Sudip
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:58:04PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > [..]
>
> Friendly ping on this?
This is an orphan package and anyone can make a QA upload.
And can you please check again if it still has the problem?
d/rules has been completely rewritten with 1.0.4-2 version
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:58:07PM -, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > [..]
>
> Friendly ping on this?
This is an orphan package and anyone can make a QA upload.
And can you please check again if it still has the problem?
d/rules has been completely rewritten with 0.76 version and
Source: 2vcard
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of '2vcard' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package
Source: altermime
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'altermime' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.p
Source: cfourcc
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'cfourcc' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.packa
Source: cldump
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'cldump' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package
Source: changetrack
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'changetrack' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/READ
Source: diffmon
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'diffmon' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.packa
Source: dpatch
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'dpatch' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package
Source: dyndns
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'dyndns' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package
Source: flpsed
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'flpsed' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package
Source: fwlogwatch
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'fwlogwatch' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README
Source: gox
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'gox' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests
Source: mailcheck
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'mailcheck' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.p
Source: makebootfat
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'makebootfat' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/READ
Source: lxmms2
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'lxmms2' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package
Source: ncap
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'ncap' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tes
Source: rdist
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'rdist' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-t
Source: tcpspy
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'tcpspy' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package
Control: severity -1 important
--
Hi,
As discussed on debian-devel, I am reducing the severity to important.
Ref: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/09/msg00266.html
--
Regards
Sudip
Source: apngasm
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in apngasm is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: apngasm | grep APNG
Executing t
Source: acorn-fdisk
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in acorn-fdisk is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: acorn-fdisk --help | gre
Source: bmf
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in bmf is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: bmf -V 2>&1 | grep version
-Tes
Source: copyright-update
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in copyright-update is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: copyright-upda
Source: herisvm
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in herisvm is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: heri-eval -h 2>&1 | grep usage
Source: procinfo
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in procinfo is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: procinfo -h
-Test-Com
Source: mmorph
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in mmorph is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: mmorph -h
-Test-Command:
Source: lockout
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in lockout is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: lockout | grep -i version
Exec
Source: vlock
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in vlock is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: vlock -h
-Test-Command: vlo
Source: trueprint
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in trueprint is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: trueprint -H
-Test-
Source: rdist
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in rdist is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
-Test-Command: rdist -V
Executing that command is
Source: python-mplexporter
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in python-mplexporter is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
- testcommand: import mpl
Source: antigrav
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in antigrav is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
- xvfb-run -a /usr/games/antigrav &
Executin
Source: aewm
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in aewm is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
- xvfb-run -a aewm &
Executing that command is consi
Source: iroffer
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in iroffer is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
- iroffer -v
Executing that command is conside
Source: gramofile
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in gramofile is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
- xvfb-run -a gramofile &
Executing that c
Source: zope.exceptions
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Severity: important
Usertags: superficialtest
Dear Maintainer,
It has been noticed that the autopkgtest in zope.exceptions is running a
trivial command that does not provide significant test coverage:
- import zope.exceptions; print
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 5:54 PM Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-12, Michael Grant wrote:
> > After update to 4.6.2-2, milter-greylist runs for a few minutes
> > processing greylist requests then exits. No error in the daemon.log.
> > Daemon restarts with systemd over and over
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:36 PM Michael Grant wrote:
>
> I have made this change:
>
>
>
> [Service]
>
> Type=forking
>
> ExecStart=/usr/sbin/milter-greylist
>
> Restart=on-failure
>
> PrivateTmp=true
>
>
>
> And it’s still restarting every few minutes:
>
>
>
> Jan 12 16:09:43 strange milter-greyli
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 05:43:07PM -0500, Michael Grant wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:02:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:36 PM Michael Grant wrote:
> > >
> > > I have made this change:
> > >
> > >
> > >
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 02:28:20PM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:milter-greylist
> Version: 4.6.2-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bookworm
> User: d...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-ac270
>
> [This bug report is not targeted to the upcoming bullseye release]
>
> The package fai
Hi Bjørn,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 07:09:40AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Package: milter-greylist
> Version: 4.6.2-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Seeing lots of these after upgrading til bullseye:
>
> Aug 23 22:12:23 louie kernel: milter-greylist[192919]: segfault at 28 ip
> 7fbaf22fe8d9 sp
46 matches
Mail list logo
