-common >= 2.0.8.
Thoughts? Strong objections?
(And for whatever it's worth, I've been posting some relevant bits to
debian-emac...@lists.debian.org lately, but I imagined that many/most
of you aren't subscribed.)
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
hat
we required before, since emacsen-common is vastly smaller than any of
the flavors.
Ideally, the dependency requirement, assuming we decide that it's
necessary, will turn out to be a temporary addition -- until we figure
out how to remove it again (perhaps with triggers, or some other
approach).
Package: graphviz
I'm planning to have guile-1.8 removed from unstable before the
freeze; please migrate to guile-2.0 as soon as possible.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-
Package: gnurobots
I'm planning to have guile-1.8 removed from unstable before the
freeze; please migrate to guile-2.0 as soon as possible.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-
e there's one more vestigial bit, i.e. the libltdl-dev
dependency in the control file. That's from guile-1.8, not 2.0, and
should no longer be necessary.
# Broken Build-Depends:
...
graphviz: guile-1.8-dev
...
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as
(Though it may turn out that we have to keep guile-1.8, and so I'd lower
them back down. As I mentioned I was planning to have that discussion
and make that decision in about a week.)
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676
e I've been keeping track of the status of various significant
rdepends (and talking to the maintainers) in order to keep track of
where we stand. Right now it looks like I'll probably be downgrading
all the bugs next week, and letting 1.8 go for another release.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
; prevents removal of 1.8? You didn't explain that.
Oh, it doesn't necessarily. That's something I was planning for us to
decide in a week or so (i.e. do we remove 1.8, or all the remaining
rdepends).
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9
t; doesn't list it, but maybe "-s
testing" isn't working right? In any case, I imagine it's the swig dep
above.
> guile-1.8-non-dfsg/non-free
Should be removed iff guile-1.8 is.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9
, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
emacs23-nox | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
Maintainer: Rob Browning
--- Reason ---
--
Checking reverse
Source: gnubik
Severity: normal
I'd like to remove guile-2.0 before the buster release, so please
migrate to guile-2.2 when you can.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03
Source: guile-gnome-platform
Severity: normal
I'd like to remove guile-2.0 before the buster release, so please
migrate to guile-2.2 when you can.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of
e there could still be scheme level incompatibilities.
Anyway, I just wanted to check and see what you thought about the
possibility of migration.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
13 matches
Mail list logo
