Package: planner
Version: 0.14.91-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After installing planner and planner-doc I expect that the 'Help' menu
item 'User Guide' will pop up the user guide. Instead I get a 'File not found'
page.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unst
Package: planner
Version: 0.14.91-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
(This seems to be a different segfault from #928029)
planner seems to segfault randomly at different times after being used
for a few seconds to a few minutes.
This is one I managed to reproduce when trying to remove a res
erhalten und bin mehr als nur zufrieden. Total geile
Sache. Meine Freundin war gestern auch total begeistert. So oft ist sie schon
lange nicht mehr gekommen *grins* Haben bestimmt 4 Stunden durchgefickt, echt
hammergeil. Kann ich nur empfehlen!
Beste Wünsche
Dein
Peter
To start your own domain name and web site in to the German Market you need the
German domain extension ".de" to become visible in the German search engines.
My service is to register your requested German domain names in my name and get
them working on German servers which fulfil the German dns
, ... Peter E.
peter@dalton:~$ bochs
Bochs x86 Emulator 2.6
Built from SVN snapshot on September 2nd, 2012
Compiled on May 30 2014 at 03:54:56
lad if you contact me.
Kind regards
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: bochs
Version: 2.4.6-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Support for vga: extension=cirrus is missing.
Add a line --enable-clgd54xx \ to debian/rules[111] and it will be
compiled in and the option can be used.
tested on amd64
best regards
Peter Schaefer
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: haxe
Version: 1:3.0.0~svn6707-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Using closures of any sort with the flash target (-swf) causes the
resulting file to give an error of the sort:
> Warning: Failed to parse corrupt data.
> VerifyError: Error #1001:
> There's no way around this unless apt-get starts supporting cross-arch
> downloads.
Well it does, if your system is multiarch.
I just tried to apt-move my amd64 and i386 packages, and lo and behold,
it only moves amd64 ones. Actually, the code looks as if it only expects
one architecture at mo
tags 575856 +patch
thanks
From my testing it appears to be sufficiant to simply drop the
build-dependency on x-dev to fix this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:
Same probllem here, version 1.3.0-1.1. I cannot see the effects using
numbers as '-f' arguments.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1303825596.307
Yes, from this Launchpad bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/apt-rdepends/+bug/315567, numeric
arguments works. I should have RTFM, --follow and --show need to be used
together to see the correct result. For example:
apt-rdepends -f 4 -s 4 gedit -d | dot -T png | display
Wish someone ca
able too?
Cheers,
weasel
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `-http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packag
So, um, just asking here: if a package fails to build on one particular
architecture due to a bug in gcc, is that a reason to remove it from
testing
If a few minor packages are blocking a transition for any reason then
it is very likely they will be removed from testing. This isn't exactly
ideal
Note: i'm just doing flyby investigation of rc bugs. I have no relationship to
either doko or this package.
This package is building ok for me.
Same here
Having looked through a number of these bugs I get the impression that doko was a
bit careless when doing his mass bug filing. Most are rea
Note: I have no particular relationship to this package, i'm just trying to
reduce the number of uninstallable packages in armhf testing.
configure.ac:210: warning: macro `AM_PATH_ALSA' not found in library
configure.ac:210: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_ALSA
If this token and ot
adopt
this package.
Description: Fix build with recent zlib
replace definition of gzFile which conflicts with recent zlib with include
of zlib.h
Author: Peter Michael Green
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/???
---
The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please
with the very best regards,
Peter
Peter Drysdale
(Uploader for festival and speech-tools)
magic.patch
Description: Binary data
it. I, of course, welcome any feedback
if you choose to give it.
With the very kindest regards,
Peter
ion not to assist in subsequent maintaining of
this package after working on this bug.
My decision is significantly influenced by the pejorative comments made
about this software by one
of the original authors at the following URL:-
http://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=200912
with best regards,
Peter
this
bug test compiles on their hardware, it works and they notify me
so I can hustle for a NMU.
best regards,
Peter
07_magic_number.diff
Description: Binary data
hack and shot in the dark since I don't own the
hardware
to test. I might get access to the hardware this weekend though.
best regards,
Peter
f and packaging will follow.
It would be great if someone else also tests this in runtime context.
very best regards,
Peter
rules
Description: Binary data
with his adoption upload so I leave this bug in patch available state.
best regards,
Peter
rules.diff
Description: Binary data
Package: rapidsvn
Version: 0.12.0dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Please drop the 'Build-Depends: libserf-0-0-dev' from rapidsvn. It
appears not to be needed. If it _is_ needed, note that I have renamed
the package to 'libserf-dev'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-package
tags 518858 +patch
thanks
A bit of grepping determined the following
linux/limits.h defines an ARG_MAX
however the various headers that include linux/limits.h explicitly state
that the version from the linux kernel headers is wrong and explicitly
undefine it.
/usr/include/bits/xopen_lim.h st
tags 526847 +patch
thanks
debhelper seems to be the only missing build-dependency (tested in
pbuilder) so adding it should be enough to fix this bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 13:06, peter green wrote:
tags 526847 +patch
thanks
debhelper seems to be the only missing build-dependency (tested in pbuilder)
so adding it should be enough to fix this bug.
This is an orphaned packages: are you interested in preparing a
tags 527532 +patch
thanks
Add "#include " to the top of the list of includes in
include/specter/specter.h to fix this bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: xml-resume-library
Version: 1.5.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
This package includes the following files:
/usr/share/java/xmlresume-filter.jar
which correspond to the following files in the source tarball:
java/xmlresume-filter.jar
The source package does not incl
tags 537034 +patch
thanks
I've just done a quick check in pbuilder and adding cpio to the build
depends indeed seems to be sufficiant to make the package build.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
Is this package maintain anymore?
Solong no changes?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Is this package maintain anymore?
Solong no changes?
Such little bug, is no hardwork to fix?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: adesklets
Version: 0.6.1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your execut
Package: anymeal
Version: 0.30-8
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your executa
Package: antennavis
Version: 0.3-6
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your execu
Package: bsdgames
Version: 2.17-16
Severity: serious
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -
DNEW_STYLE -Iinclude -Iboggle/boggle -c boggle/boggle/bog.c -o
boggle/boggle/bog.o
In file included from boggle/boggle
Source: d4x
Version: 2.5.7.1-6
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed
Source: gapcmon
Version: 0.8.9-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all neede
Source: gnome-swallow
Version: 1.2-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all n
Source: jack-tools
Version: 0.0.2-6
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all ne
.2BAC8-indirectlinking
gcc -gdwarf-2 -O2-o a.out *.o
-L/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/ComTerp/LINUX -lComTerp
-L/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/Attribute/LINUX
-lAttribute -L/home/peter/rebuild/build/ivtools/ivtools-1.2.6/src/ComUtil/LINUX
-lComUtil
/peter/rebuild/build/klineakconfig/klineakconfig-0.9/klineakconfig
/usr/lib/libkio.so /usr/lib/libkdeui.so /usr/lib/libkdecore.so
/usr/lib/libqt-mt.so -lpng -lz -lm -lXext -lSM -lICE -lpthread -lX11
/usr/lib/liblineak.so
/usr/bin/ld: klmailclient.o: in function
KLMailClient::kMailOpenComposer
Source: kradio
Version: 0.1.1.1~20061112-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide
Source: lash
Version: 0.5.4-3
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed l
Source: libengine-tpm-openssl
Version: 0.4.1+20071221-8
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. P
Source: procmeter3
Version: 3.5b-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all nee
Source: phat
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed l
Source: poe.app
Version: 0.5.1-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all neede
Source: rvm
Version: 1.16+debian-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all nee
Source: rpc2
Version: 2.8+debian-4
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all nee
Source: sfftobmp
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all need
in/ld: ../lib/libsaotk.a(text.o): in function Text::render(unsigned long,
Matrix const&, Marker::RenderMode):text.C:91: error: undefined reference to
'XSetFont'
/usr/bin/ld: ../lib/libsaotk.a(panner.o): in function Panner::renderArm(int,
Vector const&, Rotate&, char*, int):
Source: qsynth
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed
Source: tpm-tools
Version: 1.3.3-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all nee
Source: ttmkfdir
Version: 3.0.9-6
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all need
Source: sysprof
Version: 1.0.12-1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all need
Source: sweep
Version: 0.9.3-3
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed
Source: xenwatch
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all need
Source: wmfishtime
Version: 1:1.24-9.1
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all
Source: wmshutdown
Version: 0.2-3
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: no-add-needed
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all need
Source: zbar
Version: 0.8+dfsg-3
Severity: minor
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: missing-libtool-update
I did a rebuild of all packages which are affected by bug #554821. As it seems
your package doesnt do the needed autoreconf needed for libtool. When doing
autoreconf or the needed sequenc
Source: iterm
Version: 0.5-7
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so othe
Source: g2
Version: 0.72-1
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so other
Source: libdockapp
Version: 1:0.5.0-3
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library packag
Source: knoda
Version: 0.8.3-3
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so ot
Source: libiphone
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package s
Source: lineakd
Version: 1:0.9-6
Severity: wishlist
User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so
I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build
without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in
a specific library package so
Package: cuneiform
Version: 0.7.0+dfsg-5
Severity: wishlist
The current upstream version is 0.9. Please package this version.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 unstableftp.debian.org
--- Package informa
Package: cuneiform
Version: 0.7.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Please do a rebuild to resolve that problem.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 unstableftp.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends
tags 546659 patch
thanks
Nicolas's patch assumes python 2.6. That's fine for Debian, but maybe
not for upstream. This one seems to work.
Peter
--- imaplibutil.py
+++ imaplibutil.py
@@ -169,7 +169,10 @@
if last_error != 0:
# FIXME
raise so
f.keyfile, self.certfile)
Could be. I don't really know Python. If that's better, it's what
should also be done at the top of the same file, the 'import ssl' line.
That's where I ripped off the 'if' statement.
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-
Hello,
What is the status of this bug? There is no reply, no feedback,
nothing, it is just seem to be open for 300+ days.
...and it seems there ain't no midid in dosemu yet...
thank you,
peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Package: freedce-doc
Version: 1.1.0-4
freedce-doc consists of two example files in /usr/share/doc/examples,
but they are ELF binaries. They should be source code.
And more examples should be provided, but that's a wishlist bug. (:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: freedce-dceidl
Version: 1.1.0-4
The DCE IDL compiler won't do much without its include files. Thus I
would recommend combining freedce-dceidl and libfreedce-dev into one
package, or at least making the former depend on the latter.
(Come to think of it, I fail to see why freedce-uuid sh
include
files include each other.
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 141613 patch
thanks
for debian/changelog:
* Non-developer ... non-upload
* Merge freedce-dceidl and freedce-uuid into libfreedce-dev
(closes: #141613)
* libfreedce-dev Depends: libdcethreads-dev
* Move uuid back to /usr/bin: it is used for application development,
not system
1_all.deb: section is overridden from interpreters
> to doc.
> gnu-smalltalk-doc_1.95.13a-1_all.deb: priority is overridden from optional to
> extra.
Fixed in -2
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted |
Eduard Bloch schrieb am Sonntag, dem 18. August 2002:
> tags 154939 + patch
> thanks
Did you forward this patch upstream already? If you're not going to do
it I'll. Please let me know.
Peter/Debian QA
> --
> Alfie: schonmal davon gehoert, dass nicht jeder
forwarded 154939 Jonathon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
Eduard says he forwarded the patch upstream.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
me
Package: mozart
Version: 1.2.5.20030212-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi...
There appears to be a new upstream version of mozart available (there are
packages on the mozart-oz web page). Could you please upload a new version?
Thanks,
Peter
:
$need_unlink=1;
$tempfile=&tempname();
It will only succeed once because the temporary directory
("/tmp/.webmin") is never deleted and thus tempname()
does exit(0).
I suggest to replace the "chmod(0755, $tmp_dir);"
statement with "chmod(0700, $tmp_dir);"
best regards,
Peter
tags 477011 +patch
thanks
patch is attatched. just add it to the quilt series.
Index: adonthell-0.3.4.cvs.20050813/src/py_adonthell_wrap.cc
===
--- adonthell-0.3.4.cvs.20050813.orig/src/py_adonthell_wrap.cc 2008-04-20 22:54:27.00
tags 491385 +patch
thanks
replace xlibs-data with xbitmaps in the build dependencies to fix this bug
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think adding the following to the work target in debian/rules just
before the last line should make this package build succesfully
cp /usr/share/misc/config.sub work.tmp
cp /usr/share/misc/config.guess work.tmp
Unfortunately since I have been unable to reproduce the problem (it
seems to be s
tags 493411 +patch
thanks
replace the parseopt= and sys= lines near the top of the makefile with
the following to fix this bug
parseopt=parseopt/confread.o parseopt/lex.o parseopt/parse.o
sys=sys/exit.o sys/xalloc.o sys/log.o sys/communication.o
sys/sighandlers.o sys/processtitle.o sys/users.
Package: aqsis
Version: 1.1.0.20050815-4
Followup-For: Bug #324025
It seems that 'papers over' is the preferred upstream solution for the
time being.
Applying the following changes from 1.2 allowed me to build a working
version on amd64:
http://aqsis.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/aqsis?view=rev&rev
> Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3. Version 4.3 has not been
Thanks for spotting this! The exit() call is superfluous and can
simply be removed (ad_initial() needs to be called though). I fixed
this in upstream CVS.
I hope this gets propagated into Debian somehow, since the package is
or
severity 429025 normal
tags 429025 wontfix
thanks
[Eddy Petrisor]
> It is impossible to install libsvn-dev and libgnome-dev at the same
> time on the same system due to the fact that they depend on diffrent
> versions of libdb-dev.
Actually libsvn-dev doesn't depend on libdb*-dev anyway, only
in
Package: linux-igd
Version: 0.cvs20060201-2
Severity: important
Tags: security, patch
linux-igd listens for UDP mutlicast packets but does not restrict
itself to just the internal interface (which has to be specified in
any case), thereby opening itself to possible external requests for
port forwa
d against entity - #145489 - that maybe
ought to be closed now that the package has been removed.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9
itial
reporter that it should be eliminated completely if possible, but I
don't know enough to know if that's possible, or how to do it.
Thanks,
Peter
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable')
Architecture: i3
There are a few dozen source packages in the archive that contain a file
called debian/rules.old. In many cases, this was apparently the backup
copy during a cdbs conversion or something similar that should have
been removed. If you appear below, please consider fixing this.
Guenter Geiger (D
parameter point to the openbsd-kernel relativ
to the openbsd-partition.
In my example let the user use "bsd-kernel=/bsd"
and not "bsd=/dev/hda..."
And please change the hardcoded name of the openbsd-kernel.
ofboot allways set the name to "bsd". But that is no
Package: wv
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: normal
I have a word doc that wv has two (maybe separate) problems with.
With wvText, the numbering in the lists comes without the whole
hierarchy. With wvPDF, everything's line wrapped terribly. This
should maybe be two separate bugs. split if you want.
Package: abiword
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Every time I open a word document in ABIWord it displays as black on
black, and so is unreadable. Clicking anywhere on the page briefly
shows the text, but only for a fraction of a second.
In the dialogs, the background for
, O, q, Q, T, W, Y (case sensitive)
The change would involve src/plugins/ldap/commandline.c.
Many thanks!
Best regards,
Peter
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-
DEV_ITEM keys which store
information on all of the underlying block devices, so we must skip them
instead of finishing lookup.
The bug was reproduced with btrfs-progs v4.2.2.
Cc: Gene Cumm
Cc: H. Peter Anvin
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara
---
v1 ->
rom ext4 after disabling the 64bit feature?
mkfs.ext4 -O ^64bit
http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php?title=Filesystem#ext
Regards,
Peter
Package: github-backup
Version: 1.20170301-1
Severity: serious
x-debbugs-cc: barak+...@pearlmutter.net
github-backup build-depends on haskell-github << 0.16.0 but sid has 0.16.0-1
and buster doesn't have the package at all. So github-backup's build-depends are not
satisfiable in either unstable
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo