severity 720570 serious
severity 720552 serious
severity 720569 serious
severity 720561 serious
severity 720551 serious
severity 720572 serious
thanks
Hi,
I am bumping the OpenJDK-6 removal to release critical; please update /
fix your packages at your earliest convenience.
Thank you,
~Niels
-
On 2013-01-23 20:36, Paul Gevers wrote:
> tags 698661 -moreinfo
> retitle 698661 unblock: openmotif/2.3.3-8
> reopen 673690
> thanks
>
> On 22-01-13 15:21, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Can you please re-upload openmotif with the M-A (and possibly the
>> hardenin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals file (also atta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list.
The packages have been selected based on the following criteria:
- The package ha
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 09:08:22 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote:
> Source: ora2pg
> Version: 18.0-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: randomness
> X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> W
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
On Thu, 04 May 2017 17:35:00 + Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> [...]
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I suspect your patch is wrong because the original code is wrong as well.
>
> $$ in postgres SQL is (often?) used t
Package: debhelper,sgml-base
Severity: normal
Hi,
The current sgml-base setup relies on await triggers to carry out its
tasks. Originally, it was an interest trigger but due to
#825002/#825005, debhelper now inserts an activate trigger instead.
This means that any package that ships XML catalog
Control: reassign -1 sgml-base
Control: retitle -1 sgml-base: Ensure no (non-essential) dependencies
Niels Thykier:
> Package: debhelper,sgml-base
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> The current sgml-base setup relies on await triggers to carry out its
> tasks. Originall
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 11:27:20 -0400 Felipe Sateler
wrote:
> Package: systemd-shim
> Version: 10-3
> Severity: normal
> User: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: shim-patches-removal
>
> Hello Debian systemd-shim Maintainers,
>
> The Debian systemd package is currently carr
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:43:59 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> Source: libical
> Version: 2.0.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> We have src:libical3 now, so libical2 should be dropped before the
> freeze. We shouldn't need to release buster with both libical 2 an
Source: vcdimager
Source-Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-3
On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:07:05 + Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: src:vcdimager
> Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to build this package in buster but it failed:
>
>
Benjamin Barenblat:
> Niels, it looks like you uploaded src:libcdio-paranoia 10.2+0.94+2-4,
> removing the cd-paranoia binary package, because cd-paranoia(1) is
> already included in the libcdio-utils package. However, if you look at
> libcdio-utils in sid, you’ll see this is no longer the case – t
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:23:22 +0100 Klaumi Klingsporn
wrote:
> Package: cd-paranoia
> Followup-For: Bug #889803
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 19:24:07 + Niels Thykier
> wrote:
> > Source: libcdio-paranoia
> > Source-Version: 10.2+0.94+2-4
> >
> > We believ
Control: notfound -1 debian-builder/1.8.0
Control: fixed -1 1.8.0
Correcting metadata. Note if found version == fixed version then the
BTS assumes the bug is not fixed.
Source: nslint
Version: 3.2-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
nslin
Source: ns2
Version: 2.35+dfsg-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
ns
Source: stfl
Version: 0.22-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
stfl f
Source: sup
Version: 20100519-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
sup
Source: swedish
Version: 1.4.5-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
sw
Source: suck
Version: 4.3.5-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
suck
Source: gcpegg
Version: 5.1-16
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
gcpe
Source: ipsvd
Version: 1.0.0-7
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
ipsv
Source: libdigest-whirlpool-perl
Version: 1.09-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the defau
Source: libranlip
Version: 1.0-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
User: ni...@thykier.net
Usertags: rrr-no-as-default-issue
Dear maintainer,
During a test rebuild for building packages with
`Rules-Requires-Root: no` as the default in `dpkg`,
li
retitle 1083037 RM: directfb -- RoQA; RC-buggy, unmaintained
user ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
userags 1083037 remove
severity 1083037 normal
thanks
Hi,
As suggested by Simon (full context below), lets remove this package
now. Only one rdeps remains (BTS blocker set, so it will disappear
25 matches
Mail list logo
