Hello,
Would you like to fix this RC bug and adopt the package?
https://bugs.debian.org/1042911
and the orphan bug is here: #1016558
Best,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
Manphiz writes:
>> Nicholas D Steeves writes:
>>
>
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> I have now prepared a merge request to migrate away from assoc.el[1] and
> also forwarded the patch upstream. Also set the package as team
> maintained and add myself as an upload. PTAL
Hi,
Reply follows inline. Can we move this discussion to #1016558 to not
bother Axel with our discussion?
Manphiz writes:
> Nicholas D Steeves writes:
>>>> Nicholas D Steeves writes:
>>>>
> Thanks! Though I'm not really a user of muse-el, I'd
On Sun, 6 Aug 2023 at 04:37, Manphiz wrote:
> Nicholas D Steeves writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Reply follows inline. Can we move this discussion to #1016558 to not
> > bother Axel with our discussion?
I guess that's a no?
> > Manphiz writes:
> >&
Control: block -1 by 1016558
Hi,
I'm just updating this bug to note the adopted muse-el package is just
about ready to upload (the ITA is also a pseudo-RFS bug), and I plan to
upload in the next few days. If this update isn't enough to prevent
autoremoval...well, at least the package will be fix
Control: severity -1 important
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 08:19:52PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:01:41PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > Package: schroot
> > Version: 1.6.10-3+b1
> > Followup-For: Bug #857470
> > Cont
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for filing this bug, and thank you for providing the
upstream URL for this issue. As this is not an RC issue I expect the
resolution will be deferred until bullseye (buster+1/Debian 11).
If the problem is strictly in btrfs-progs it is likely that
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi Bruno,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 05:45:24PM +0100, Bruno Kleinert wrote:
> Package: btrfs-progs
> Version: 4.19.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-3-amd64
>
Please confirm if btrfs-progs/4.20.1-1 on linux/4.19.0-2-amd64 is
also affected.
Thanks!
N
Hi,
Ola Lundqvist writes:
> Hi
>
> Thank you for the report. To whoever looks at this report and try to solve
> it.
> An obvious solution is to remove the build dependencies. That will not work
> on its own, one must also disable the tests that are executed by it.
>
> This functionality did not
9 matches
Mail list logo
