Bug#640812: How can I reproduce this?

2014-08-16 Thread Marco d';Itri
tag 640812 - unreproducible moreinfo thanks On Sep 10, Guido Trotter wrote: > I tried to reproduce this with something like p11tool --provider > /usr/lib/pkcs11/libopencryptoki.so --list-tokens but it doesn't fail. > Can you please tell me what command exactly you're running, and how it fails? T

Bug#1076222: tcpd,tcm: install program with same name (tcpd)

2024-07-12 Thread Marco d';Itri
reassign -1 tcm On Jul 12, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Please find a solution for your packages. Ideas: /usr/sbin/tcpd has been there since 1990 and is basically a public API. tcm is unmaintained abandonware and its popcon count has been declining for 15 years. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc

Bug#187369: libcdparanoia0: libraries not correctly linked

2003-04-02 Thread Marco d';Itri
Package: libcdparanoia0 Version: 3a9.8-7 Severity: normal [This is a standard text.] One or more libraries in this package are buggy. All libraries need to be linked against other libraries which they reference. You can check this by running this command: LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 LD_BIND_NOW=1

Bug#492334: must not depend on makedev

2008-07-25 Thread Marco d';Itri
Package: tvtime Severity: normal Packages which need to create a device node must depend on udev | makedev. OTOH this package tries to create V4L devices which we can assume exist on every Debian system which has not been broken by the local administrator, so I suggest you just remove the MAKEDEV

Bug#434165: must not depend on makedev

2007-07-21 Thread Marco d';Itri
Package: camstream Severity: normal Packages which need to create a device node must depend on udev | makedev. Also, MAKEDEV must be called as /dev/MAKEDEV, not /sbin/MAKEDEV (and you should remove the [ ! -c /dev/video0 ] test which is meaningless with udev, and the devfs test which has been use

stupid dependencies on update-inetd

2007-07-28 Thread Marco d';Itri
I don't know exactly how it happened, but a large number of maintainers apparently ignored the discussions on this list and added to their packages a dependency on update-inetd. This is *TOTALLY WRONG* because the /usr/sbin/update-inetd interface is guaranteed to be provided by whatever implements

Bug#347958: Fails to establish pppoe connection

2006-01-14 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Jan 14, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, do you think this is caused by a broken config file? Yes. > Well, my question is quite simple: How can I get a solid working > configuration? auto isp iface dsl-provider inet ppp pre-up ip link set eth1 up provider dsl-p

Bug#347958: Fails to establish pppoe connection

2006-01-14 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Jan 14, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >2. I can not start pon with 2.4.4 at all > > What further information would you need? A detailed log showing what does not work (tcpdump and ppp.log are a good start). -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#347958: Fails to establish pppoe connection

2006-01-14 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Jan 14, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached is the promissed tcpdump output. Just ask me for further > infromation. The ppp_2.4.4 dump is not clear. If you will open it in ethereal you will see a first successful PPP connections, which is not terminated until later (packet 41-4

Bug#347958: Fails to establish pppoe connection

2006-01-19 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Jan 16, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ping 193.175.81.44 > ---> failed I do not know what your problem is, but the PPP session is successfully negotiated and even DNS queries are exachanged. Your pings to 193.175.81.44 are rejected by 193.175.81.253 which is on the same network, so

Bug#233810: yaboot does not recognizes RAID file systems

2006-06-27 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Jun 27, Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am really tempted to apply that patch, it seems so trivial, despite I can confirm that I have been using it without any problem on multiple systems for more than two years. > the fact Ethan is very reluctant to do so. :( Ethan just does no

Bug#347958: Fails to establish pppoe connection

2006-07-23 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Jul 24, Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then, this pppoeconf bug will be closed (or reassign to ppp > package if you want) except you have new informations for Don't. This behaviour is a feature. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#860523: python-dogtail: /bin/sniff fails to start on a merged-/usr system

2018-08-06 Thread Marco d';Itri
Control: severity -1 grave On Apr 18, intrig...@debian.org wrote: > It looks like sniff is assuming too much wrt. the location of icons > relatively to the location of the executable. Since merged-/usr is now the default, I am raising accordingly the priority of this bug. This is the last packag

Bug#979231: the new mailcap entry breaks mutt

2021-01-04 Thread Marco d';Itri
Package: a2ps Version: 1:4.14-6 Severity: critical Tags: newcomer X-Debbugs-Cc: vagr...@debian.org The recent NMU of a2ps converted the package to dh, and this enabled dh_installmime which was present in debian/rules but commented. The installed file adds to mailcap an entry for "text/plain", wh

Bug#979231: the new mailcap entry breaks mutt

2021-01-04 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Jan 04, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Removal sounds like a reasonable fix as well, although there are a > handful of reverse dependencies of various forms: > > $ apt rdepends a2ps > a2ps > Reverse Depends: > Depends: apsfilter QA > Recommends: magicfilter QA > Suggests: jed-extra barely r

Bug#245460: gnome-keyboard-properties breaks my keyboard configuration

2004-04-23 Thread Marco d';Itri
Package: capplets Version: 1:2.6.0.3-2 Severity: normal Tags: experimental upstream The problem is that I set some bindings with xmodmap in .xsession, but when starting gnome gnome-keyboard-properties will override them when loading a new layout. The workaround I'm using is removing all layouts fr

Bug#951010: signify and signify-openbsd names

2024-10-05 Thread Marco d';Itri
On Oct 05, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I would like that 'apt install signify' install OpenBSD's signify (from > the Debian 'signify-openbsd' package) and not the 2003 mail-related > signify perl script from the Debian 'signify' source package. Agreed: the current signify package is a niche tool mai