Bug#1062953: python3-pyocd: Module is unusable (missing runtime dependencies)

Hi, thanks for the report. I also noticed this while working on the adoption of the package. This particular problem can be worked around easily, but it's unfortunately not the only one. My current plan is to disable jlink support as a first step as it needs non-free components. The other prob

Bug#555325: Bug located, patch will follow

Hi! Michael Stapelberg successfully located the problematic piece of code. For some reason, the problem is only visible on amd64. On i386, gq behaves just fine and shows an error message. The problem is an incorrect reuse of a va_list structure in errorchain.c. I'm currently preparing a patch.

Bug#555325: Bug located, patch will follow

Please ignore my previous message, it was targeting a different gq bug. But somehow i fear it might be related. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#568526: GQ crashes on amd64 when trying to display error messages

tag 568526 patch tag 568526 fixed-upstream thanks This is actually unrelated to gnome-keyring present or not. It's caused by incorrect use of a va_list. Fixed in upstream git: commit 31c78c22db21163a49eda4bee6076aeec774c9b2 Cheers, sur5r -- ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam. signature

Bug#363704: #363704 fixed by patch for #568526

merge 363704 568526 thanks #363704 is caused by the same programming error that was responsible for #568526, merging bugs. -- ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#445945: Does this still persists?

tag 445945 moreinfo thanks Can you please check whether this problem persists with current versions of gq and gtk/cairo? Accordings to the cairo bugtracker, 8 bit TrueColor visuals are supported since 1.6.0. -- ceterum censeo microsoftem esse delendam. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#989566: freeaptx is in Debian

Just to prevents others from spending more time digging into this: libfreeaptx, which is a fork of libopenaptx 0.2.0, is available in Debian since bookworm. The only reverse dependency of libopenaptx at the time of writing is baresip. AIUI, there's currently no functional difference between both

Bug#819585: local-apt-repository: add a "suite" name to local-apt-repository.list

Hi, I played around with options for Release file generation. While it's possible to put Packages/Sources files in a subdirectory and specify that as Suite and Codename when building the Release file, it still doesn't enable the use of e.g. apt install foo/local So unless I'm missing something,