Source: cernlib
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 20061220+dfsg3-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before t
Source: paw
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1:2.14.04.dfsg.2-8
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the
Source: geant321
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1:3.21.14.dfsg-10
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package indirectly depends or
build-depends is destined to be removed from the arc
Source: grace
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1:5.1.23-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the relea
Source: ia32-libs
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1:0.5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the releas
Source: freesci
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 0.6.4-7
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the releas
it time_t transition.
+
+ -- Graham Inggs Thu, 01 Feb 2024 05:47:50 +
+
hfsplus (1.0.4-17) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
diff -Nru hfsplus-1.0.4/debian/control hfsplus-1.0.4/debian/control
--- hfsplus-1.0.4/debian/control2023-01-08 15:44:44.0 +
+++ hfsplus-
~git20200803.9490b14-4.1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Graham Inggs Thu, 01 Feb 2024 05:55:07 +
+
highwayhash (0~git20200803.9490b14-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Orphan this package. (See #1013208)
d
elog
--- jaula-1.4.0/debian/changelog2022-10-13 12:50:55.0 +
+++ jaula-1.4.0/debian/changelog2024-02-01 16:01:47.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+jaula (1.4.0-8.1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
-- lasi-1.1.3/debian/changelog 2023-04-23 07:06:58.0 +
+++ lasi-1.1.3/debian/changelog 2024-02-01 18:17:35.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+lasi (1.1.3-2.1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Graham Inggs
it time_t transition.
+
+ -- Graham Inggs Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:25:16 +
+
lcm (1.3.1+repack1-7) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
diff -Nru lcm-1.3.1+repack1/debian/control lcm-1.3.1+repack1/debian/control
--- lcm-1.3.1+repack1/debian/control2023-12-06 00:27:57.0 +
+
* Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Graham Inggs Mon, 05 Feb 2024 13:50:40 +
+
ncap (1.9.2-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
diff -Nru ncap-1.9.2/debian/control ncap-1.9.2/debian/control
--- ncap-1.9.2/debian/control 2020-09-12 20:47:14.0 +
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Graham Inggs Mon, 05 Feb 2024 17:59:48 +
+
nsync (1.26.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Debian Janitor ]
diff -Nru nsync-1.26.0/debian/control nsync-1.26.0/debian/control
--- nsync-1.26.0/debian/cont
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Graham Inggs Mon, 05 Feb 2024 18:27:16 +
+
obexftp (0.24-9) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
diff -Nru obexftp-0.24/debian/control obexftp-0.24/debian/control
--- obexftp-0.24/debian/cont
Package: src:apt-xapian-index
Version: 0.54
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
apt-xapian-index fails when Python 3.12 is the default.
$ axi-cache info
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/axi-cache", line 864, i
Control: tags -1 + patch
The patch below was applied in Ubuntu.
--- a/axi/__init__.py
+++ b/axi/__init__.py
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@
Read the "/etc/services"-style database of value indices
"""
try:
-re_empty = re.compile("^\s*(?:#.*)?$")
-re_value = re.compile("^(\S+)\s+(
Source: djvubind
Version: 1.2.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
This package has dependencies, build-dependencies and/or autopkgtest
dependencies on python3-distutils. The python3-distutils binary
package will s
Source: pdfkit
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
This package has dependencies, build-dependencies and/or autopkgtest
dependencies on python3-distutils. The python3-distutils binary
package will soon be droppe
Source: python-djvulibre
Version: 0.9.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
This package has dependencies, build-dependencies and/or autopkgtest
dependencies on python3-distutils. The python3-distutils binary
package will soon
Source: python-sparkpost
Version: 1.3.10-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
This package has dependencies, build-dependencies and/or autopkgtest
dependencies on python3-distutils. The python3-distutils binary
package will soon be dropped
Source: python-sshoot
Version: 1.4.2-3
Severity: serious
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
python-sshoot's autopkgtests fail with Python 3.12 [1]. I've copied
what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://ci.debian.net/pack
Source: redland-bindings
Version: 1.0.17.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.11 python3-all-dev
Hi Maintainer
This package build-depends on python3-all-dev, but does not build
extensions/libraries for all supported python3 versions. This
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
The severity of this bug keeps mtink out of testing, and needs more information.
Source: python-fswrap
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
python-fswrap's autopkgtests fail with Python 3.12 [1]. I've copied
what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://c
Source: dblatex
Version: 0.3.12py3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12
Hi Maintainer
dblatex FTBFS with Python 3.12. I've copied what I hope is the
relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
Traceback (most recent call last)
larming to
users.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dblatex/tree/rawhide
Description: Fix several SyntaxWarnings
Use raw strings to avoid invalid escape sequence
Author: Graham Inggs
Last-Update: 2024-01-22
--- a/lib/dbtexmf/dblatex/grubber/texparser.py
+++ b/lib/dbtexmf/dblatex/grubber/te
On 21 January 2013 22:39, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Ok, let's try 3 and see where that takes us. I'm not keen on 2 because
> > there are still proprietary applications being used that need libXm.so.3
> > and libXm.so.4.
>
I have still not found a single application that uses any of the Motif's
XmP
I've had a look at incorporating
d/patches/05-multiarch-specialcase-libdir-X11.patch into configure.ac as a
build option, and was thinking that perhaps now is the time to move these
platform independent files, as Sergio suggested, from /usr/lib/X11/bindings
to /usr/share/X11/bindings and into a sep
Actually, it looks like we should ditch libmotif4 and name the separate
packages libXm4, libUil4 and libMrm4.
On 31 January 2013 21:41, Graham Inggs wrote:
> I've had a look at incorporating
> d/patches/05-multiarch-specialcase-libdir-X11.patch into configure.ac as
> a build o
On 3 February 2013 23:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> Not perfect yet, but I did some of the work on the split (bed time now
> though). Pushed to the repo.
>
Ah, I actually did this on Thursday and Friday last week, although I went
as far as making a libmotif-common as well.
> Does this also count
On 5 February 2013 09:13, Paul Gevers wrote:
> But you forgot to push... Lets agree that we either tell the other that
> we are working on something, or just push (soon).
>
I thought I had made it clear I was going to work on splitting libmotif4,
but no harm done. Again I have study commitments
On 6 February 2013 22:07, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I think that if we have the split of -common, it is time to upload the
> package to experimental, to see if the ftp-masters can let the new
> package into main. We can then also start to ask dependent package to
> try out building against motif inste
On 7 February 2013 08:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 07-02-13 07:03, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > The only other thing I can think of is splitting libmotif-dev into
> > libxm4-dev, libmrm4-dev, libuil4-dev
>
> Don't you think this is a little overkill? Not that I have a str
The last few commits were the result of some testing against builds in my
PPA:
installing libmotif-dev and libmotif-dev:i386
installing libmotif4-dbg and libmotif4-dbg:i386
upgrading from 2.3.3 with all motif packages installed, including libmotif4
and libmotif4:i386
On 17 February 2013 09:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Do you really care for the numbers in front? I usually find them
> annoying, especially in the future, when some patches might get dropped
> because they are fixed and others not, do you then rename again? This
> tends to make reading history more d
Recent changes (19 February)
Hi, I just wanted to clear up a few things regarding the recent changes I
committed.
1. FTBFS on Ubuntu Raring:
I had recently upgraded a test machine to Raring for another project and
decided to try building motif on it. I encountered numerous error similar
to the f
On 24/02/2013 21:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
1. FTBFS on Ubuntu Raring:
I think the following page holds the answer:
http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking
I already had a look at that page when I was creating the symbols.
Indeed a lot of good info there.
I think the change in Raring happened
I committed some changes and updated the changelog.
I am not done yet though, I still want to have a good look at the Red
Hat package and see if there is anything that will be useful.
I can already see that we can probably get rid of the system.mwmrc symlink.
I also want to investigate building
On 8 March 2013 21:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I prefer to do this by adding that file to a file called debian/clean.
> That way you don't have to override dh_clean.
>
>
Thanks, I'll look into that.
On 8 March 2013 21:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Can you please elaborate why you find this nicer? You didn't need the
> clean up before, and now you do. So, why?
>
Previously, we had to create a directory and then copy to debian/tmp/etc...
which I always thought was a bit of a hack.
I believe this
On 8 March 2013 21:50, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Where did you get this file? What is the copyright? Is this file created
> as png or is it actually created in a program and does that program
> store the file in a different format so that you can edit it? In the
> later case, we also need that source
I've been looking at the motif packaging for Fedora 19 [1]. I see they
also renamed their openmotif package to motif.
The only changes we don't have now are in the man pages relating to
relocated files.
There are still many references to X11R6.
Regarding my patch 14:
Including ft2build.h seems to
Paul, if you think my recent changes to:
05-multiarch-specialcase-libdir-X11.patch
13-fix_hardcoded_x11rgb_path.patch
and
14-fix_ac_find_xft.patch
are sane, then I'll send those patches upstream.
I've cleaned up some things, added copyright info for custom_mwm_badge.png
and updated the changelog.
As noted in 14-fix_ac_find_xft.patch, we can probably eventually drop the
build-depends on libfreetype6-dev and libxrender-dev as they only seem to
be used in the tests in ac_find_xft.m4. Although
On 13 March 2013 22:14, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 03/12/13 22:19, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > Shouldn't the xprint related symbols have been commented out so we don't
> > get the #MISSING warnings?
>
> That is fine. I thought I had done that.
>
After asking that ques
Hi Paul
On 17 March 2013 10:58, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If this is true, we do have an (small) issue. You can not just relicense
> this file without permission of the copyright owner. So, you have no
> choice other than state the license of this file as GPL-3 or ask
> Canonical to relicense.
>
I u
On 17 March 2013 12:10, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The one in d/copyright. Please see below. (Don't forget to add the GPL3
> required text to the file.) (And are you sure it is not GPL3 or later?)
>
Yes, from d/copyright in unity-greeter:
Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-
Hi Paul
You wrote that you wouldn't upload 2.3.4-2 until 2.3.4-1 had been reviewed.
Is it possible to re-upload our current effort as 2.3.4-1 (with the
appropriate changes to the changelog and libxm4.symbols)?
It may then be possible to get Ubuntu to sync motif from Debian's NEW queue
and still ma
On 25 March 2013 09:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Are you sure? I believe the NEW queue is ONLY accessible to the
> ftp-masters, as uploads might contain non-distributable material, and
> the task of the ftp-masters is exactly to prevent that entering Debian.
>
I'm not sure exactly how it was done, b
Hi Paul
I think the testing went very well. As we suspected, most packages only
required changing the build-depends on lesstif2-dev to libmotif-dev. There
were a few that required the addition of libxt-dev and one or two that
required libxext-dev and libxp-dev (although we should try to remove t
On 7 May 2013 08:19, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Can you please document that, I mean which ones? It would be great if
> you would reply to the e-mail I sent yesterday to the release team with
> full details, so that the team knows when they make a decision.
When I get home tonight I will compose an e
I agree with the message. I can suggest some minor grammatical changes
though.
On 7 May 2013 21:56, Paul Gevers wrote:
> This is currently no problem as
> this is pulled in by the lesstif2-dev package that you do depend on.
>
I would say "This is current not a problem as"
> Lesstif2 was ori
Source: tcm
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 2.20+TSQD-4.2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxt-dev but does not declare this
relation in the debian/control file. This is currently not a
Source: xabacus
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 7.7.1-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxt-dev but does not declare this
relation in the debian/control file. This is currently not a p
Source: xpdf
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.03-10
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxt-dev but does not declare this
relation in the debian/control file. This is currently not a prob
Source: xsol
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 0.31-9
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxt-dev but does not declare this
relation in the debian/control file. This is currently not a probl
Source: gridengine
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 6.2u5-7.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxft-dev and libxp-dev but
does not declare this relation in the debian/control file. This
Source: mgdiff
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1.0-29
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxt-dev and libxext-dev but
does not declare this relation in the debian/control file. This is
cur
Source: xawtv
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.102-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer,
Your package build depends on libxp-dev but does not declare this
relation in the debian/control file. This is currently not a pro
Hi All
Below is a status update on the bugs filed against packages that
required additional build dependencies:
ferret-vis#707211
gridengine#707937
hotswap#707621
mesa-glwUbuntu-only package, to be replaced by glw (LP: #1179164)
mgdiff #707943
sqshLP: #1134233 fix release
Another status update:
ferret-vis#707211 fix released in ferret-vis 6.6.2-2
gridengine#707937
hotswap#707621
mesa-glwUbuntu-only package, to be replaced by glw (LP: #1179164)
mgdiff #707943
sqshLP: #1134233 fix released in sqsh 2.1.7-2
tcm#707923
xabacus#707926 fix r
Another status update:
ferret-vis#707211 fix released in ferret-vis 6.6.2-2
gridengine#707937
hotswap#707621
mesa-glwUbuntu-only package, to be replaced by glw (LP: #1179164)
mgdiff #707943
sqshLP: #1134233 fix released in sqsh 2.1.7-2
tcm#707923
xabacus#707926 fix r
As per the motif 2.3.4 release notes [1], motif 2.3.4 is binary compatible
all the way back to motif 2.2.
I believe this means bug #587683 [2] should have been solved by symlinks
rather than bumping the name libmotif3 to libmotif4.
I cannot say why upstream bumped the soname when it was not necessa
Hi Paul
Thanks for uploading!
On 25 May 2013 17:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If we fixed the FTBFS, do you want to start filling wishlist bugs
> against the reverse dependencies of lesstif2-dev? (I am working on nedit
> already). Or do you want me to start them? If you do, please don't
> forget to
Source: arb
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 5.5-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
Your package build-depends on libmotif-dev. Motif 2.3.4 was recently
released under LGPL and the openmotif package in non-free has bee
Source: cluster3
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1.50-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
Your package build-depends on libmotif-dev. Motif 2.3.4 was recently
released under LGPL and the openmotif package in non-free h
Source: alliance
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 5.0-20120515-4
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before t
Source: cmucl
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 20c-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release o
Source: ddd
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1:3.3.12-4
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the releas
Source: geomview
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1.9.4-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the rele
Source: gridengine
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 6.2u5-7.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the
Source: plan
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1.10.1-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
Source: mtink
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1.0.16-6
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the releas
Source: mgdiff
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1.0-29
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
Source: elk
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.99.8-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
Source: sqsh
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 2.1.7-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
Source: twclock
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.1-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
Source: tcm
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 2.20+TSQD-4.2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the rel
Source: twpsk
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 4.0-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release o
Source: xastir
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the releas
Source: viewmol
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 2.4.1-19
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the rele
Source: xmpi
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 2.2.3b8-13
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the relea
Source: xabacus
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 7.7.1-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the relea
Source: xball
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.0.1-1.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the relea
Source: xtel
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.3.0-16
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
Source: xpuzzles
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 7.6.3-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the rele
Source: whitedune
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 0.30.10-1.1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the
Source: hotswap
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 0.4.0-12
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the rele
Source: pcb
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 20110918-8
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the releas
Source: xawtv
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.103-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
Source: grass
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 6.4.2-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
Source: xshisen
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1:1.51-4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive befor
Source: glw
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 8.0.0-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release o
Source: xmakemol
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 5.16-6
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the relea
Source: via
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 2.0.4-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release o
Source: sciplot
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 1.36-15
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the relea
Source: ferret-vis
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 6.6.2-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the re
Source: gromacs
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 4.5.5-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the relea
Source: ctn
User: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: lesstif2motif
Version: 3.0.6-13
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: openmo...@packages.debian.org
Hi Maintainer
The lesstif2 package on which your package depends or build-depends is
destined to be removed from the archive before the release
On 2 July 2013 18:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> I think motif should provide a transitional lesstif2-dev package
> instead, if it's deemed safe to do so.
>
> I'm not sure this is going to be safe. It looks like ABI breakages in
xbae and xmhtml, and very likely in inventor as well.
Transitioning
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo