Bug#1006181: rename 1006181 to RFP: czkawka

2022-02-21 Thread Neil Williams
retitle 1006181 RFP: czkawka - remove unnecessary files from your computer. reassign 1006181 wnpp noowner 1006181 thanks >* What led up to the situation? > fslint was removed from the Debian repos > >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > Cried

Processed: rename 1006181 to RFP: czkawka

2022-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1006181 RFP: czkawka - remove unnecessary files from your computer. Bug #1006181 [fslint] fslint is no longer available. Seems to be superseeded by Czkawka Changed Bug title to 'RFP: czkawka - remove unnecessary files from your computer.

Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

2022-02-21 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, dem 21.02.2022 um 00:55 -0300 schrieb Joao Eriberto Mota Filho: > Package: docbook > Version: 4.5-9 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: Mark W. Eichin , Adam Di Carlo > , J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) , Yann Dirson > , Steve Langasek , Daniel Leidert > (dale) , Jakub Wilk , Mathieu > Malaterre , He

Bug#1006198: marked as done (docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream)

2022-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:57:06 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream has caused the Debian Bug report #1006198, regarding docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

2022-02-21 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Montag, dem 21.02.2022 um 10:57 -0300 schrieb Eriberto Mota: > [..] > Considering that docbook is orphan plus your reply (or your very > aggressive reply), Maybe you should re-consider your approach and reflect on the actions you were announcing. I cannot even believe that a DD threatens to r

Who knew answering ‘Yes/No’ questions could be so profitable?

2022-02-21 Thread Calin
Introducing GooglrCash! A system that pays fat profits just for answering simple “Yes or No” questions on Google over n' over again! 100% cloud-based app that transforms any niche into a gold mine pocketing you thousands of dollars! => Turn Google into cash dispensing ATM >>> https://clicks.a

Don't get left behind! Here's your private INVITATION…

2022-02-21 Thread Calin
We all know what it takes to make a consistent income online. Trying product after product just to let the frustration take its toll and force you to quit on your dreams. DON'T quit just yet. An ultimate loophole has been exposed that pays you again and again for answering “Yes or No” questions

Processed: bug 826002 is forwarded to https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-hg/commit/7159e4a0307b74afdd58faec950f19421878bcc4 https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-hg/issues/44

2022-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 826002 > https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-hg/commit/7159e4a0307b74afdd58faec950f19421878bcc4 > https://github.com/mnauw/git-remote-hg/issues/44 Bug #826002 [git-remote-hg] drops all Debian backports tags: error: * Ignoring funny re

Processed: limit source to git-remote-hg, tagging 1006038, tagging 826002

2022-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source git-remote-hg Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'git-remote-hg' Limit currently set to 'source':'git-remote-hg' > tags 1006038 + pending Bug #1006038 [src:git-remote-hg] git-remote-hg: FTBFS: dh_auto_tes

solarwolf is marked for autoremoval from testing

2022-02-21 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
solarwolf 1.5+dfsg1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-03-29 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1005438: pygame: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.10 3.9" --system=custom --test-args "/usr/bin/xvfb-run {interpreter} -m pygame.tests.