Processed: Re: Bug#979047: RM: pepperflashplugin-nonfree -- RoQA; No longer work; upstream eol

2021-01-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:pepperflashplugin-nonfree Bug #979047 [ftp.debian.org] RM: pepperflashplugin-nonfree -- RoQA; No longer work; upstream eol Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'src:pepperflashplugin-nonfree'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bu

Bug#979689: marked as done (pepperflashplugin-nonfree: Installation script fails to download flash from adobe's servers)

2021-01-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:18:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979689: fixed in pepperflashplugin-nonfree 1.8.8 has caused the Debian Bug report #979689, regarding pepperflashplugin-nonfree: Installation script fails to download flash from adobe's servers to be marked as

Processing of pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.8_source.changes

2021-01-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.8_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.8.dsc pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.8.tar.xz pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.8_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host u

Processed: Re: Bug#978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release

2021-01-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #978954 [pepperflashplugin-nonfree] pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > retitle -1 pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm Bug #978954 [pep

Bug#978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release

2021-01-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: severity -1 important Control: retitle -1 pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of bookworm On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:14:49 +0100 Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote: > But let me add that even if Opera fixes that, users may think they want > to enable flash, try to install pepperflashplugin

pepperflashplugin-nonfree_1.8.8_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2021-01-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:47:39 +0100 Source: pepperflashplugin-nonfree Architecture: source Version: 1.8.8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Andreas Beckmann Closes: 979689 Cha

Bug#978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release

2021-01-15 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
On 2021-01-15 17:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote: I've just uploaded 1.8.8 turning the package into a dummy removing the broken download/install functionality and the chromium integration s.t. people will upgrade to a "fixed" version (that does not block trying to download unavailable bits). That shou

Processed: Re: nast: ftbfs with GCC-10

2021-01-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #957577 [src:nast] nast: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 957577: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957577 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#957577: nast: ftbfs with GCC-10

2021-01-15 Thread Logan Rosen
Package: nast Version: 0.2.0-7 Followup-For: Bug #957577 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu hirsute ubuntu-patch Control: tags -1 patch Hi, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * d/p/gcc-10: Fix FTBFS with GCC 10. Thanks for considering